Electromagnets and Conductors: The Effects on a Pendulum

  • Thread starter Thread starter XigmaTek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnets
AI Thread Summary
When a magnet pendulum is affected by a nearby electrical conductor, Lenz's Law indicates that eddy currents will form in the conductor, opposing the magnet's motion. This interaction causes the pendulum to slow down more rapidly, resulting in a quicker decrease in amplitude. The period of the pendulum remains largely unchanged, particularly at small angles, despite the reduction in amplitude. To measure the amplitude, one can capture a time-exposure image to determine the maximum deflection. The orientation of the magnet's poles does not affect the outcome, as both poles produce similar effects.
XigmaTek
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Question:
Describe what will happen when a magnet suspended in the form of a pendulum is affected by an electrical conductor in close proximity.

My working:
Lenz's Law states that the emf induced in a conductor will oppose the emf of the change that produced it. Let's say I designed my experiment this way...

[PLAIN]http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/562/assessment.png
the dotted line represents the trajectory of the pendulum (should be a perfect parabola shape..)

The magnet moving over the sheet of metal will produce eddy currents in the metal, which will oppose the magnetic field caused by the magnet. Thus, this will cause the pendulum to slow down faster and its period and amplitude will decrease much quicker than if there was no conductor.

Am I correct? What else can be said about this situation? Is there a changing magnetic field present here?
Thank youuuuu!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What you said about the EM is basically correct, but a couple of comments:

(1) Pendulums move on a circular path, not a parabola.

(2) The period of a pendulum is pretty much independent of the amplitude. The amplitude will decrease, but the period will not change.
 
thanks for that info. but your second point would apply only to small angles.
how would i go about measuring the amplitude?
also, does it matter which end of the magnet (N or S) is facing the sheet of metal as it moves over it?
 
XigmaTek said:
thanks for that info. but your second point would apply only to small angles.
how would i go about measuring the amplitude?
also, does it matter which end of the magnet (N or S) is facing the sheet of metal as it moves over it?
-You are correct, the period is only independent of amplitude only for small angles.
-To measure the amplitude, you need to measure the maximum deflection. You could take a time exposure picture or a movie and measure it off the picture.
-It doesn't matter whether it is the N or S pole, the effect is the same.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
6K
Back
Top