Electrostatic Forces on Three Hypothetical Parallel Planes

AI Thread Summary
In a scenario with three infinite parallel planes, where plane-one is positively charged, plane-two negatively charged, and plane-three positively charged, the interaction between these planes raises questions about electrostatic forces. Plane-one does not experience direct electrostatic force from plane-three due to the shielding effect of plane-two, which is influenced by the superposition principle. The net electrostatic force on the movable rigid body formed by plane-one and plane-two is primarily the attraction between plane-two and plane-three. However, the presence of plane-one does not neutralize this attraction; instead, it contributes to the overall electric field. Ultimately, electrostatic forces are not shielded but can be affected by the arrangement and nature of the charges involved.
rogainuser
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Say there is are three hypothetical infinite parallel planes with charges on it. So let's imagine the three planes from left to right, or planes one, two and three.

Plane-three is fixed to the reference frame. Plane-one and plane-two have a fixed separation distance between each other, but is movable with respect to the reference frame and plane-three (while maintaining the parallel relationship).

If plane-one is positive charge, plane-two is negative charge and plane-three is positive charge, does plane-one experience electrostatic force due to plane-three directly (or is it shielded)? Is the net electrostatic force on the plane-one and plane-two 'movable rigid body' simply that between plane-two and plane-three (i.e. attraction in this case) or will the charge on plane-one somehow neutralize or reduce the attraction in this case?

In other words I am wondering if electrostatic forces are felt through other charges or whether the forces effectively become shielded to a degree?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The superposition principle states that all fields simply get overlayed. There is no shielding. The only thing that can diminish the field is electrostatic induction.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top