Electrostatics in RC\DC Circuits-feedback process

AI Thread Summary
Understanding electrostatics in circuits involves analyzing how surface charges on wires create a steady electric field that drives free electrons. The feedback process is crucial for achieving a stable state where current remains constant, as any imbalance between incoming and outgoing currents leads to an increase in charge within the wire. If the current entering a section of wire exceeds the current leaving, the excess charge accumulates, potentially leading to infinite potential energy. This accumulation prompts a natural equalization of currents, as the excess charge influences the electric field and current flow. The discussion emphasizes the need for a deeper exploration of the mechanisms behind this feedback process in circuit behavior.
Dweirdo
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I've always had problems conceptualizing the physics behind circuits, and it always felt like information is hidden from me.

Lately I've been trying to analyze circuits in the microscopic and electrostatic way, as i think it is crucial for real understanding of circuit concepts.

I've found many articles suggesting about the surface charges piled on the surface of the wires that finally make the nearly steady and parallel to the wire electric field that moves the free electrons inside the wire(knowledge that wasn't given in any introductory physics course i know of).

Anyway, there is one concept which is mentioned in all these articles and chabay's textbook but isn't covered to it's fullest(IMO), the feedback process.
That fast process where the electrons move and pile periodically so that the circuit will finally be in a steady-state, where the current is constant.
I'm interested in the way it happens, both the mathematical and conceptual ideas behind this process, why is the current must be constant through a wire with constant resistance.

Why a state where current I1 is entering a section of a wire and a current I2 leaves this section where I2 < I1, is not a stable state , and it will tend to equalize these two Currents?

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dweirdo said:
Why a state where current I1 is entering a section of a wire and a current I2 leaves this section where I2 < I1, is not a stable state , and it will tend to equalize these two Currents?

If I2 < I1 then the charge of that section of wire is increasing. Unless I2 eventually approaches I1, the charge in the section of wire and the potential energy would grow towards infinity!
 
That seems reasonable, I'm interested in they way these currents are equalized, the access charge in that section sticks to the surface of the wire(how does it get there??) and dampens I1 and Increases I2?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.

Similar threads

Back
Top