Electrostatics - probably a standard question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total charge and electric field of a solid non-conducting sphere with a non-uniform charge distribution. The total charge is derived as Q = ∏ρsR^3 through integration. For the electric field inside the sphere, participants note the lack of symmetry and suggest that Gauss's theorem may not apply directly. However, it is recommended to find the charge enclosed within a radius r' < R and use integration to determine the electric field. The conversation highlights the need for careful consideration of charge distribution when applying electrostatic principles.
exuberant.me
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
Q) A solid non-conducting sphere of radius R carries non-uniform charge distribution with charge density ρ = ρs(r/R), where ρs is a constant. Show that
(a) the total charge on the sphere is Q = ∏ρsR3, and
(b) find the electric field inside the sphere.

Now first part (a) is fairly easy,
assumed a sphere of radius x and then after further integration got the result

But i need an idea for the second part..
since there is no symmetry so "Gauss" theorem is of no use applying...
I think i need an integration there as well. But can someone provide me an idea on how to continue further. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
since there is no symmetry so "Gauss" theorem is of no use applying...
There is a spherical symmetry.
 
How did you get the answer to part a. It seems incorrect to me.
 
Never mind, I got it.
 
barryj said:
Never mind, I got it.

what about the electric field?
 
exuberant.me said:
what about the electric field?

Use Gauss' theorem. Find the charge enclosed in a radius r'<R. Use integration.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top