Electrostatics problem inslator and a conductor problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two infinite sheets of charge and a conducting plate, with specific surface charge densities provided. The user attempts to calculate the electric field at the origin using superposition but arrives at an incorrect value, prompting confusion about the role of the conducting plate. They express uncertainty about how to account for the charge redistribution on the conductor and its effect on the overall electric field. The user seeks clarification on the correct approach to determine the electric field and the surface charge density on the right side of the conducting plate. The thread highlights the complexities of applying electrostatic principles in this scenario.
koab1mjr
Messages
105
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A. Two infinite thin sheets of charge are placed perpendicular to the x axis. The surface charge densities of the two plates are (SC density 1 = 8.5 C/M2) and (SC density 2 = 1.5 C/M2. Placed near plate 2 is a think conducting metal plate with a (SC density of -3.0 C/M) Find the magnitude of the field at the origin

problem has a diagram

d = 60 cm

plate 1 (2d space separation) origin (d space separation) plate of thickness d (d space separation) plate 2

B. what is the surface charge density on the right side of the conducting plate?

Homework Equations



The only equation needed is the E field formula for infinite plates which is surface charge density/ 2 * permitivity constant



The Attempt at a Solution


a.
I was applying superposition to this problem realizing that the conductor will be a different formula of surface charge density/ permitivity constant. With this route I got 4.802e11N/C for plate 1 E field, 8.47e10N/C for plate 2's e field and 3.389e11N/C for the conducting plate. Adding them together gave me 2.26e11N/C. The correct answer is 5.65e11N/C. I noticed that if i disregard the plate all together it works out but it might be a coincidence and I do not understand why which is why I am posing the question on the board.


The conducting plate is generating a field and I know the charges will shift to respond to the charged plate to the right of it. But its stronger than that plate and should still be generating a field. Not sure why you would just ignore it any help would be much appreciated.

b.
Since I have been stuck on part a.
no clue on how to break this down but I assume its having the conductor shift charge to keep its center neutral but I am not sure how to go about doing that. I tried calculating the net field experienced by the plate in the center. Not sure if this is correct
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am assuming my lack of response is for the lack of the equations and stuff


[..P..]------------------------[...Con...]-----------[..P..]
[..l...]------------------------[..ducting...]-----------[..l...]
[..a..]------------------------[...metal...]------------[.a...]
[..t...]------------------------[...p...]------------[..t...]
[..e..]------------------------[...l...]------------[..e..]
[...]------------------------[...a...]------------[...]
[...] ------2d-------*---d---[...t...]----d-------[...]
[.1...]------------------------[...e...]------------[..2..]
[...]------------------------[.....]------------[...]
[...]------------------------[.....]------------[...]
[...]------------------------[----d-----]------------[...]


\sigma1 = 8.5 C/m2
\sigma2 = 1.5 C/m2
\sigmametal plate = -3.0 C/m2
d = 60 cm

Work Formulas

E = sigma[\tex] / 2 epsilon <sub>0</sub> &lt;-----For Insulating plate<br /> E = sigma[\tex] / epsilon &lt;sub&gt;0&lt;/sub&gt; &amp;lt;----- For Conducting plate &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; hopefully this is a little better I need to find the field strength at point * and I need to find the \sigma&lt;sub&gt;right side of metal plate&lt;/sub&gt;
 
Last edited:
I am sure this problem is within the realm of ability the homework helpers here. Yet no one has answered. If there is an issue with it please let me know what it is and I will try and fix it.

Not sure why no one has answered I have seen post addressed within the hour

what gives!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top