Finding the no of equivalent classes

  • Thread starter Thread starter commutator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classes Equivalent
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a given relation over the set of integers, defined by \( m = n \mod (p) \) for a positive integer \( p \), is an equivalence relation. Participants are exploring the nature of the equivalence classes and the number of such classes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of equivalence classes, with one noting that the class of \( m \) consists of elements of the form \( m + kp \). There is an exploration of specific examples, such as when \( p = 10 \), to identify distinct classes and their repetitions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided encouraging feedback and clarification on the definition of equivalence classes. There is acknowledgment of the number of distinct classes being equal to \( p \), but the formal proof and definition are still under consideration.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the formal definition of equivalence classes and the implications of their findings, with a focus on how to structure a proof. There is mention of using induction as a potential method for formal proof.

commutator
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

please consider the relation over the set of integers Z , given by m=n mod (p) where p is a positive integer . Prove that it is an equivalent relation.
find the elements in the equivalent class of m.
find the no of such equivalent classes.

Homework Equations





3.equivalent relation-proved by showing reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity.
the equivalent class of m consists of elements of the type
m +k p where k = 0,+/-1,+/-2...
but i am not able to think how to find the no of such classes. any help will be highly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi commutator! :smile:

(have a ± :wink:)
commutator said:
… the equivalent class of m consists of elements of the type
m +k p where k = 0,+/-1,+/-2...

that's right! :smile:

ok, when you're stuck it's often useful to try an easy example …

if p = 10, what are the equivalence classes? :wink:
 
thanks . that was really encouraging.

for p=10, i got something like [-1]=(...,-11,-21-1,9,19,29...)
[0]=(...-10,-20...0,10,20,...)
[1]=(...-29,-19...1,11,21,31...]
interestingly , [11] is coming same as [1]. [-1] is coming the same as [9].so i think there are 10 distinct classes, which are repeating over and over. then the answer has got to be 10. ie. p. but how do i sketch a formal proof ? by induction?
 
hi commutator! :smile:
commutator said:
… so i think there are 10 distinct classes, which are repeating over and over. then the answer has got to be 10. ie. p. but how do i sketch a formal proof ? by induction?

that's right, there's exactly p classes

the formal proof isn't the problem …

the problem is the formal definition

once you have that, the proof is obvious

eg your definition {...-29,-19...1,11,21,31...} is only a list, so that's not helpful, but your earlier definition (I'm expanding it a little) [m] = {m +kp : k in Z} should do it :smile:

(btw, always use squirly brackets for listing the elements of sets :wink:)
 
thanks a lot !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K