Elephant toothpaste experiment cannon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ForumFire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cannon Experiment
AI Thread Summary
The "elephant toothpaste" experiment involves mixing hydrogen peroxide and potassium iodide to create a foamy reaction. Attempting to use this reaction in a sealed pipe to create a cannon-like effect is impractical due to the conservation of momentum. The lightness of the foam means that to achieve significant lift, an impractically high speed would be required. This principle is similar to rocket propulsion, where the exhaust gases must be expelled at high velocities to generate sufficient thrust. Overall, the experiment cannot be effectively used as a propulsion system.
ForumFire
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
"elephant toothpaste experiment" cannon?

I saw a video of an experiment called "elephant toothpaste" on youtube, where a guy put hydrogen peroxide and potassium iodine in a graduated cylinder, and it all foamed up, and went out of the graduated cylinder. If you put the chemicals in a pipe with a cap on one end, and a valve on the other, would it shoot it like a cannon? or perhaps it would be powerful enough to be like a jet pack, and you could fly around your neighborhood?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Unfortunately not.
There is something called conservation of momentum.
That means that the speed*mass that you move up must equal the speed*mass of the thing that goes down.
The foam doesn't weigh very much so to lift you 70kg at 1m/s (walking speed) you would have to spit out 70kg of foam at 1m/s or 7kg of foam at 70m/s. Since foam is very light you would need very high speed.
You can see this with rockets, because the mass of the exhaust gas is so small you have to fire it out at very high speed - while with a firehouse sending out heavy water you feel a force at much lower speeds.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top