- #1
jhirlo
- 40
- 0
hi! nice board!
1 Q : why can't we (can we?) eliminate HIV by replacing all the blood from one's body ?
1 Q : why can't we (can we?) eliminate HIV by replacing all the blood from one's body ?
Originally posted by Monique
Because the T-cells (which get affected) are also in other places than in the blood. I then think: why not do chemotherapy and kill all the white blood cells and give a bone marrow transplant. But HIV hides inside of the DNA in cells, also in non-dividing cells, so is not affected by chemotherapy/radiation.
No, replacing all the blood in the body will not eliminate HIV. While HIV is found in the blood, it also exists in other bodily fluids and tissues. Simply replacing the blood would not get rid of the virus entirely.
The purpose of replacing all the blood in the body to eliminate HIV is to remove the infected blood cells and replace them with healthy, uninfected ones. This can help boost the immune system and potentially slow the progression of the virus.
The blood replacement process, also known as a blood transfusion, involves taking donated blood from a healthy individual and infusing it into the bloodstream of the patient. This can be done through a needle inserted into a vein or through a tube placed in a larger blood vessel.
No, replacing all the blood in the body is not a cure for HIV. While it may temporarily reduce the amount of virus in the body, it does not completely eliminate it. HIV is a chronic condition that currently has no cure, but can be managed with medication and other treatments.
Yes, there are risks and potential side effects associated with replacing all the blood in the body. These can include allergic reactions to the donated blood, infections, and potential complications from the transfusion process. It is important to discuss the risks and benefits with a medical professional before undergoing this procedure.