Classical EM Course Choices: Jackson or Schwinger?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kostas230
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jackson
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on choosing between Jackson's and Schwinger's textbooks for a graduate course in electromagnetism (EM). Jackson's book is widely regarded as a classic and is the standard reference, often recommended by professors due to its comprehensive coverage and availability in libraries. Schwinger's text, while also highly praised for its depth and unique insights, is less commonly used. The professor for the course suggests both books and plans to assign exercises from each, although Jackson's will likely dominate due to its prevalence. Some participants express a preference for a more modern approach to EM, advocating for texts like Landau & Lifshitz or Scheck's, which incorporate relativistic quantum field theory perspectives. Recommendations include considering older editions of Jackson for cost-effectiveness and supplementing studies with guides or workbooks to aid comprehension, especially for those who may struggle with the material.
kostas230
Messages
96
Reaction score
3
So, I'm taking a graduate course on EM and I don't know which textbook to take: Jackson's book or Schwinger's? Any suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you a prof? What text does he suggest? Presumably the course will have some homework assignments.

There's one sound
That no one knows
What does the prof say?

Jackson is one of those classics that everybody wants everybody else to have read.

Of course, Schwinger is available for Kindle. Oh, for about the same as the paperback version of Jackson.
 
Well, he recommends both of them and he said he will be giving exercises from both of these texts, although I have a feeling that most of these will be from Jackson since it's the standard and there are more copies in the library.
 
I don't know about Schwinger's but Jackon's book is great (trust me).
 
  • Like
Likes Demforiq
Jackson is the standard source. I like it very much, but Schwinger is simply a master piece, and I like. It's full of gems. Alone the treatment of cylindrical Bessel functions with elegant operator techniques is worth the whole book.

I don't like both books conceptionally wise so much. They are both written from a classical perspective. From a HEP/nuclear theoretical physicist's point of view, classical electromagnetism should be introduced as a relativistic classical quantum field theor (and it's in fact the paradigmatic example of one such theory with the clear advantage that it describes a vast amount of observable facts and has far-reaching applications in electrical engineering, electronics, and optics). The best book from this point of view is, in my opinion, Landau&Lifshitz vol. 2 or Scheck's Theoretical Physics book vol. 3 (I'm not sure whether there's an English translation of the latter, but the German edition is great).
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
Hi Hendrik, yes Scheck's book was translated also under Springer Verlag. Indeed, an excellent book.
 
Buy the one most used in class, and if your professor is going to swap about equally, then you probably should buy both. You can buy an older edition of Jackson, it is the standard and older editions are probably readily available for a LOT less money than the newest edition (also look at Indian publishers).

My next advice, buy a study guide if you can and buy an REA or Schaum's workbook. I had a professor that couldn't be bothered with stupid questions (the only kind I knew how to ask...), so that was a necessity for me. We used two textbooks, Jackson and Griffiths. Griffiths was far easier to read and the problems were far easier to do. I suspect Grittiths was really an undergrad text, but it complemented Jacksons and allowed the class to comprehend the more difficult concepts.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
212
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top