Why do electromagnetic waves use complex numbers?

AI Thread Summary
Electromagnetic waves are represented by complex numbers because they simplify the mathematical treatment of sinusoidal functions through Euler's theorem, allowing for a more compact representation. Using imaginary exponentials facilitates easier calculations, such as taking time derivatives to find velocities. The total energy of a harmonic oscillator can be expressed more compactly with complex notation, enhancing clarity in calculations. This approach is particularly beneficial in RF and microwave electronics, where phasor forms streamline the analysis of transmission lines. Overall, complex numbers provide a powerful tool for representing and manipulating electromagnetic wave equations efficiently.
phabos
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
why electromagnetic waves are represented by complex numbers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My answer is a bit general but I think its pretty relevant:

Waves and harmonic oscillators are represented by sinusoidal functions. Using Euler's theorem you can rewrite them as the (real part) of an imaginary exponential, where the exponent is i*(arg), where the argument is the same one you would use for an oscillator(wt +phase) or a wave (kx - or +wt + phase).

Its a bit more convenient to work with imaginary exponentials since they're more compact, taking their time derivatives to get velocities for example.

Something worth trying to illustrate that example: show that the total energy (T+V) of a harmonic oscillator is proportional to the square of the amplitude. You can do this either way, but I think its more compact if you use y(t) = Re{Ae^(iwt)} instead of Acoswt as your starting point.
 
EM wave usually are of sinusoidal nature. It is easier to represent harmonic wave ( sinusoidal) in cosine wave:

\vec E =E_0 cos\;(\omega t -\vec k\cdot \vec R)\;=\; \Re e [E_0 e^{j\omega t}e^{-j\vec k \cdot \vec R}]And then use phasor form where \tilde E = E_0 e^{-j\vec k \cdot \vec R} \;\hbox { and }\;\vec E = \Re e [\tilde E \;e^{j\omega t}]The solution of homogeneous harmonic wave equation is something like:

\nabla ^2 E +\delta^2 \vec E = 0 \;\hbox { is } E^+ e^{-\delta \vec k \cdot \vec R} +E^- e^{\delta \vec k \cdot \vec R} \;\hbox { where } \delta = \alpha + j\betaIt is not as common in Physics than in RF and microwave Electronics. In RF, we deal with transmission lines where we can assume the direction of propagation in z direction which really simplify the calculation tremendously. We avoid all the differential equations, PDE, integration and differentiation. In fact I learn in reverse order. I have been using phasor calculation to design filters, matching networks for years before I really start learning EM!
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top