EM Waves: Charged or Not? Why?

AI Thread Summary
Electromagnetic (EM) waves are not charged because they do not carry an electric charge. Light, which is composed of EM waves, does not cause objects to become charged when exposed to it, supporting the idea that EM waves themselves are neutral. While EM waves consist of oscillating electric and magnetic fields, these fields can influence charged particles without the waves being charged. The distinction lies in the nature of the waves, which are fundamentally different from charged particles. Therefore, EM waves remain uncharged despite their ability to interact with charged matter.
vbalouria
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Are EM waves charged? Why ? Why Not ?
Please Explain
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, they're not.
 
Thanks for reply. But can u explain abit Why So?...
 
Why would you think they might be charged?
 
Light consists of EM waves. If it was charged then any object exposed to light would become charged too but that's not the case.
EM waves consist of electric and magnetic fields so they can influence charged particles but they are not charged themselves.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top