Emergence of Superstring from Pure Spinor

MTd2
Gold Member
Messages
2,019
Reaction score
25
http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.3548

Emergence of Superstring from Pure Spinor

Ichiro Oda
(Submitted on 17 Jun 2011)
Starting with a classical action where a pure spinor $\lambda^\alpha$ is only a fundamental and dynamical variable, the pure spinor formalism for superparticle and superstring is derived by following the BRST formalism. In this formalism, not only the string variable $x^m$ but also the space-time spinor $\theta^\alpha$ are emerged as the Faddeev-Popov (FP) ghosts of a topological symmetry and its reducible symmetry. This study suggests that the fundamental theory behind the pure spinor formalism of the superstring might be a topological field theory.*****************************

I thought that the title of this paper was totally ambitious, so, I am posting it here for comments. Mitchel Porter and others, what can you say about this paper? Is it really amazing as the title implies?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The second paragraph has to be the most succinct explanation ever of what the pure spinor formalism is about, and the third paragraph is the ingenious idea behind the paper in one sentence. It certainly starts well...
 
I believe I now understand the paper somewhat better.

In perturbative string theory, you use a d=2 CFT which lives on Riemann surfaces (the worldsheet of interacting strings). Normally, the CFT includes some bosonic fields (the space-time coordinates of the string), some fermionic fields (superpartners of those coordinates), and ghost fields from BRST quantization. In the pure spinor formalism, the ghosts are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_spinor" .

http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.1147" , Berkovits proposed to start with the bosonic fields and the pure spinor fields, and to derive the fermions as the ghosts. (Lisi wanted to do something similar with E8 theory, but the difficulty is to get the right statistics for the ghosts.) Usually you would use a "Virasoro constraint", but here he used a d=10 generalization of the constraint from twistor theory. The resulting theory is supersymmetric, so he calls it supersymmetry emerging from a twistor-like constraint.

Oda wants to go further and have the CFT bosons emerging as ghosts as well. So he would be starting with a worldsheet CFT consisting of nothing but pure spinors, with the bosons emerging as "ghosts for ghosts", second-order ghosts for the fermionic ghosts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top