Empirical verification of massive Chirality

  • Thread starter Thread starter Creator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cern Chirality
Creator
Messages
566
Reaction score
6
I want to ask someone here with a good practical background about the intrinsic quantum mechanical chirality (not helicty)...of say, a beta particle...Namely, What is the experimental proof of the existence of two distinct chiralities (not helicities) of the electron? IOWs, how can it be it empirically verified...(without, of course, building a 500 GEV accelerator like CERN ; and seeing how it interacts with the W.)??

If I'm not mistaken (correct me if I'm wrong) the right and left CHIRAL electron, for example, has to do with different shifts in the phase of the wavefunction upon rotation, ...but how do we actually effect a rotation and verify that phase shift difference in practice?

Not exactly looking for the theoretics of the standard model, although I'm sure I need the refresher...

I am asking specifically about intrinsic electron chirality differences, in particular,say, the left chiral electron and the right chiral one(anti-positron) and how the differences are empirically verified. IOWs, how do you measure that difference; what chiral property is manifested that can be measured.
Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vanadium 50 said:
You can see the measurement here: http://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.109.1015

This tells you that the neutrino is left-handed, and that it couples to the left-handed chiral component to the electron.

Thanks Vanadiun for the link .

So this is a deduction based upon gamma (left handed) helicity measurements (in electron capture), implying left hand helicity neutrinos, and due to SM theoretics only the left helicity neutrinos can couple to a left chiral electron (component) (through the W), thus we deduce there are left chiral electrons.?? No ?

Creator

--"Procrastination is suicide on the installment plan."--
 
Last edited:
Yes, although a great deal of "SM theoretics" goes by the name of "conservation of angular momentum".
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top