Energy Acceleration: Electron Mass at C?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EP
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
EP
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
If when you accelerate an electron to the speed of light, it will hit a speed limit of C. At C the electron will gain mass from all the energy that is still trying to accelerate it, right? Then my question is that what happens to the mass it gained while it was attempting to pass C? Does it just lose mass as a result of deaccelerating? Or is the electron actually heavier than before?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are many threads on this issue in the relativity forum. Here's an example:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=99416"

Several things to quickly note:

1) There are at least two kinds of "mass" in relativity, invariant mass and relativistic mass. The latter increases with speed, the former doesn't.
2) The relativistic mass always increases with speed, even at small speeds. The object doesn't have to hit the speed limit for you to see that effect.
3) Massive objects can never actually reach the speed of light (it requires an infinite amount of energy), but they can get very, very close to it.
4) In most cases, if an object is decelerating, something is taking energy from it. A loss of relativistic mass is effectively a loss of energy. Energy can take many forms, so the answer to this question:

Then my question is that what happens to the mass it gained while it was attempting to pass C?

depends on what was causing it to decelerate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Energy conservation is still the rule. The energy required to accelerate a mass appears to accrue to that mass as measured by observers in different inertial reference frames.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top