Energy Bands: Kronig-Penney Model

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter torehan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Model
torehan
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
In Kronig-Penney Model we seek solutions for time independent Scrödinger equation inside and outside of the periodic potential.
Delta.png


for 0 < x < a;​
V(x) =
V0 for -b < x < 0​

My question is why solution of the KP Scrödinger equation in the region of [tex]-b < x < 0[/tex] doesnot have complex exponentials as in the region of [tex]0 < x < a[/tex] ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In this region we have
[tex] \frac{{d^2 \psi }}{{dx^2 }} = k^2 \psi,[/tex]

where

[tex] k^2 = \frac{{2m\left( {V_0 - E} \right)}}{{\hbar ^2 }}.[/tex]
The solution to this 2nd order ODE is a linear combination of exponentials (with real arguments). If you think about it physically, the wavefunction will also decay in this area, which can only happen if the argument of the exponential is real.
 
Niles said:
In this region we have
[tex] \frac{{d^2 \psi }}{{dx^2 }} = k^2 \psi,[/tex]

where

[tex] k^2 = \frac{{2m\left( {V_0 - E} \right)}}{{\hbar ^2 }}.[/tex]
The solution to this 2nd order ODE is a linear combination of exponentials.


OK, so what about first region?

[tex] \frac{{d^2 \psi }}{{dx^2 }} = q^2 \psi,[/tex]

where
[tex]q^2 = \frac{{2m\left( {E} \right)}}{{\hbar ^2 }}.[/tex]

Isn't it also 2.nd order ODE ?
 
In the region with V=0 we have
[tex] \frac{{d^2 \psi }}{{dx^2 }} = -\hat k^2 \psi,[/tex]

where

[tex] \hat k^2 = \frac{{2m\left( {E} \right)}}{{\hbar ^2 }}.[/tex]

Solutions are traveling waves (going left and right).
 
Oh i see, I had some conceptual errors on writing the wave eq.
Thanks!
Torehan
 
I know that this topic doesn't take much attention of most of you as there are more interesting topics about paradoxes of physics but I need a little bit guidance about reproducing the band structure diagrams shown in Kittel , 170p in 8th Edition :)

So we have different wave solution for V0 region and 0 region,

[tex]\psi_{1}(x)=Ae^{ikx}+Be^{-ikx}\ \ \ \ \ \ \ for \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0<x<a[/tex]

[tex]\psi_{2}(x)=Ce^{qx}+De^{-qx}\ \ \ \ \ \ \ for \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \-b<x<0[/tex]

After we apply the boundary conditions (usual QM boundary condiions in in square well potentials ),

[tex]\psi_{1}(0) = \psi_{2}(0)[/tex] and [tex]\psi_{1}'(0) = \psi_{2}'(0)[/tex]

[tex]\psi_{1}(a) = \psi_{2}(-b)[/tex] and [tex]\psi_{1}'(a) = \psi_{2}'(-b)[/tex]

Then, we have four equations

[tex]A+B=C+D[/tex]

[tex]ik(A-B)=q(C-D)[/tex]

[tex]Ae^{ika}+Be^{-ika}=(Ce^{-qb}+De^{qb})e^{i\alpha(a+b)}[/tex]

[tex]ik(Ae^{ika}-Be^{-ika})=q(Ce^{-qb}-De^{qb})e^{i\alpha(a+b)}[/tex]

Determinant of the coefficients of this equation system mush vanish to have solutions. Than determinant yields,


[tex]([q^{2}-k^{2}]/2qk) sinh(qb)sin(ka) + cosh(qb)cosh(ka) = cos (\alpha(a+b))[/tex]


Finally my issues
  • How can I define the allowed and forbidden energy values?
  • to be continued...


[tex]e^{i\alpha(a+b)}[/tex] ---->The term [tex]\alpha[/tex] came from Bloch's Theorem and (a+b) came from application of transitional symmetry operation to Bloch form wavefunction!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
2K