Energy Bands: Kronig-Penney Model

  • Thread starter Thread starter torehan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Model
torehan
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
In Kronig-Penney Model we seek solutions for time independent Scrödinger equation inside and outside of the periodic potential.
Delta.png


for 0 < x < a;​
V(x) =
V0 for -b < x < 0​

My question is why solution of the KP Scrödinger equation in the region of -b &lt; x &lt; 0 doesnot have complex exponentials as in the region of 0 &lt; x &lt; a ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In this region we have
<br /> \frac{{d^2 \psi }}{{dx^2 }} = k^2 \psi,<br />

where

<br /> k^2 = \frac{{2m\left( {V_0 - E} \right)}}{{\hbar ^2 }}.<br />
The solution to this 2nd order ODE is a linear combination of exponentials (with real arguments). If you think about it physically, the wavefunction will also decay in this area, which can only happen if the argument of the exponential is real.
 
Niles said:
In this region we have
<br /> \frac{{d^2 \psi }}{{dx^2 }} = k^2 \psi,<br />

where

<br /> k^2 = \frac{{2m\left( {V_0 - E} \right)}}{{\hbar ^2 }}.<br />
The solution to this 2nd order ODE is a linear combination of exponentials.


OK, so what about first region?

<br /> \frac{{d^2 \psi }}{{dx^2 }} = q^2 \psi,<br />

where
q^2 = \frac{{2m\left( {E} \right)}}{{\hbar ^2 }}.

Isn't it also 2.nd order ODE ?
 
In the region with V=0 we have
<br /> \frac{{d^2 \psi }}{{dx^2 }} = -\hat k^2 \psi,<br />

where

<br /> \hat k^2 = \frac{{2m\left( {E} \right)}}{{\hbar ^2 }}.<br />

Solutions are traveling waves (going left and right).
 
Oh i see, I had some conceptual errors on writing the wave eq.
Thanks!
Torehan
 
I know that this topic doesn't take much attention of most of you as there are more interesting topics about paradoxes of physics but I need a little bit guidance about reproducing the band structure diagrams shown in Kittel , 170p in 8th Edition :)

So we have different wave solution for V0 region and 0 region,

\psi_{1}(x)=Ae^{ikx}+Be^{-ikx}\ \ \ \ \ \ \ for \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0&lt;x&lt;a

\psi_{2}(x)=Ce^{qx}+De^{-qx}\ \ \ \ \ \ \ for \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \-b&lt;x&lt;0

After we apply the boundary conditions (usual QM boundary condiions in in square well potentials ),

\psi_{1}(0) = \psi_{2}(0) and \psi_{1}&#039;(0) = \psi_{2}&#039;(0)

\psi_{1}(a) = \psi_{2}(-b) and \psi_{1}&#039;(a) = \psi_{2}&#039;(-b)

Then, we have four equations

A+B=C+D

ik(A-B)=q(C-D)

Ae^{ika}+Be^{-ika}=(Ce^{-qb}+De^{qb})e^{i\alpha(a+b)}

ik(Ae^{ika}-Be^{-ika})=q(Ce^{-qb}-De^{qb})e^{i\alpha(a+b)}

Determinant of the coefficients of this equation system mush vanish to have solutions. Than determinant yields,


([q^{2}-k^{2}]/2qk) sinh(qb)sin(ka) + cosh(qb)cosh(ka) = cos (\alpha(a+b))


Finally my issues
  • How can I define the allowed and forbidden energy values?
  • to be continued...


e^{i\alpha(a+b)} ---->The term \alpha came from Bloch's Theorem and (a+b) came from application of transitional symmetry operation to Bloch form wavefunction!
 
Last edited:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top