Energy Calculations please check work (thanks)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on energy calculations related to work and gravitational potential energy. A participant incorrectly assumes that lifting a barbell over a longer time results in four times the work done, but another contributor clarifies that work remains constant regardless of the time taken, as work is defined by force times distance. For the second problem regarding a 2kg block thrown upward, the initial calculations for potential energy increase are mostly correct, but the final height must account for the starting height of 20m, resulting in a total height of 45m above the Earth's surface. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the distinction between work and power in physics calculations. Accurate application of formulas is crucial for solving these types of problems effectively.
blackout85
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
Please someone check to see if on the right track:

A woman lifts a barbell 2.0m in 5.0s, beginning and ending at rest. If she lifts the same distance in 10s, the work done by her is:

I said it would be four times as much because I used 1/2mv^2. I placed the v I calculated from v=d/t into the kinetic equation. (.4)^2 (.2)^2
.16 is four times as much as .04. Is this right.

A 2kg block is thrown upward from a point 20m above the Earth's surface. At what height above the Earth's surface will the gravitational potential energy of the earth-block systme have increased by 500J.

work:

mgh= 2(9.81)(20m)= 392.4 --> potential
500J= mgh
500J = (2kg)(9.81) (h)
h= 25m

If someone could point me in the right direction of how to do this problem I would appreciate it. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
blackout85 said:
Please someone check to see if on the right track:

A woman lifts a barbell 2.0m in 5.0s, beginning and ending at rest. If she lifts the same distance in 10s, the work done by her is:

I said it would be four times as much because I used 1/2mv^2. I placed the v I calculated from v=d/t into the kinetic equation. (.4)^2 (.2)^2
.16 is four times as much as .04. Is this right.

I don't think so - I think the work will be the same - Work Done = Force x distance - taking longer means less power but the same work.

A 2kg block is thrown upward from a point 20m above the Earth's surface. At what height above the Earth's surface will the gravitational potential energy of the earth-block systme have increased by 500J.

work:

mgh= 2(9.81)(20m)= 392.4 --> potential
500J= mgh
500J = (2kg)(9.81) (h)
h= 25m

If someone could point me in the right direction of how to do this problem I would appreciate it. Thank you.

This one I think is correct - except the actual height is 45, you need to add the 20m you started with.. When you're as close to the Earth as this, the mgh formula is fine.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top