Energy conservation and particle acceleration

AI Thread Summary
Energy conservation in particle acceleration, such as in a cathode ray tube (CRT), involves the conversion of electrical energy into kinetic energy. When a potential difference is created between the anode and cathode, energy is stored in the electric field, allowing electrons to accelerate towards the anode. Even if some electrons do not hit the anode, they still gain kinetic energy from the potential difference, as energy is transferred along their path. The energy does not solely depend on hitting the anode; rather, it is related to the movement through the electric field. Understanding this concept clarifies how energy conservation applies in particle acceleration scenarios.
Axe199
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
As i am a physics amateur and most of what i learned is through videos, i sometimes get confused about energy conservation, my question concerns particle acceleration in CRT for example, we create a potential difference ( which requires energy) between the anode and the cathode, then the electrons are ejected at the cathode and accelerates towards the anode. Now naturally ( according to my narrow knowledge) the kinetic energy gained by the electrons is equal to the energy used in the charge separation to create the potential difference, because the electrons hit the anode they decrease the charge separation, but in the case of a CRT, some of them miss the anode to hit the screen or whatever, so where does this energy come from? the part i don't understand is how it gained energy and it didnt hit the anode to decrease the potential to compensate for the energy it gained.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You do not need to hit anything to change potential energy. It is sufficient to travel along a path which is not perpendicular to the electric field.
 
Orodruin said:
You do not need to hit anything to change potential energy. It is sufficient to travel along a path which is not perpendicular to the electric field.
Can you explain more please
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top