Energy Conservation in Quark Confinement

Macch
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I was reading about quark confinement and came up with a doubt i can't find the answer to:
You have to use energy to try to 'pull away' one of the quarks in a meson, right? And when you give enough energy, a new quark/anti-quark pair is created and that's why you never find only one quark. But, what if i give energy to the system but not enough so that the quark/anti-quark pair is created? What happens to the energy i gave to the system? Is it reemitted or does it stay in the system as potential energy?

I tried to think about it but can't figure this out.

Thanks for the help in advance. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would bet the quarks would dance around for a while --until some relaxation time will have passed-- and then emit radiation (photon, or whatever).
 
You can look at an experiment to clarify the situation, e.g. deep inelastic scatterin

p\,+\,e\,\to\,X\,+\,e

The energy is provided by an electron and transferred to the proton by a (virtual) photon. The final state contains again the electron plus a (quite complex) hadronic state X which is usually not discussed (we neglect non-hadronic states X like "Bremsstrahlung" due to electromagnetic interaction b/c they have nothing to do with confinement).

Now one can look at the possible states X depending on the c.o.m. energy E.

The lowest possible state is X=p, i.e. elastic scattering.
The next state would be something like X=Δ+ where only orbital angular momentum is transferred to the proton, i.e. the Δ+ has the same quark content (uud) but spin 3/2.
Another possible final state is a X=p+π° or X=n+π+ i.e. pion production. This is the first example where a quark is pulled out of a proton, where the energy is converted into a quark-antiquark pair which eventually forms a new particle (a pion) plus the original proton. In that case you can even draw a simple Feynman diagram for process.

Now for each such process there is a so-called threshold energy which can be determined kinematically w/o any knowledge about the details of QCD dynamics. For X=p the threshold is zero, elastic scattering is always allowed. For X=Δ+ it's a nice exercise to do the calculation; it's nothing else but energy-momentum conservation. For X=p+π° or X=n+π+ it's more comoplicated b/c now there are three particles (including the electron) in the final state.

So the answer is quite simple: if the energy is not sufficient to pull out a quark from the proton and to form a new, complex hadronic state X, it simply does not happen; the nucleon stays intact (elastic scattering) or is excited (Δ-resonance).
 
Last edited:
Thanks a lot for the answer, tom.stoer, it clarified a lot of things for me.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top