Can Magnets in Equilibrium Defy Energy Conservation Laws?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of three magnets in equilibrium, specifically how potential energy and friction interact when one magnet is moved closer to another. It argues that when the third magnet is brought near a fixed magnet, it should not return to its original position due to the stored potential energy, but it does, suggesting a flaw in the analysis of energy conservation. Participants debate whether the repulsive forces at play contradict the conservation of energy principles. The conversation highlights misunderstandings about magnet behavior and energy dynamics in such systems. Ultimately, the inquiry seeks clarification on energy conservation in magnetic interactions.
paras02
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
If three circular or ring type magnets are placed such tnat centeral magnet is having its center at origin and other two are placed at its aperture repeling each other but they are just at enough distance such that the whole system is in equillibrium, placed on surface having friction.
If i fix any of the two magnets i.e a centeral one and anyone of the above and try to move the third one closer to the second fixed magnet and , leave it, it gets back to its orignal position.
The energy i spent in bringing them together is stored as potential energy and some part of that energy is lost in form of heat so at that particular point when the third one is close to the second one the system was just having the potential energy stored in it which is to be spent against friction also so the third magnet must not return to its orignal position but it is returning to its orignal position due to repulsion .
So please explain the the conservation of energy in this case.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The analysis is flawed.
When you let go, the magnet does not return to it's equilibrium position - even in the absence of friction.

Where did you get this from?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top