Energy Interaction: Work Transfer in a Heated Oven

  • Thread starter Thread starter AirForceOne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Interaction
AI Thread Summary
Energy transfer in a heated oven involves both work and heat, with the heating element and air inside the oven considered a closed system. When the oven is turned on, work is done on the system as electrons flow through the heating element, crossing the system boundary. Although the flow of electrons could suggest mass flow, it is negligible compared to the overall mass of the system, allowing it to be treated as a closed system in terms of mass. Mass flow is not equated with work; instead, the significant factor is the electrical charge transfer. Energy can be transferred in the forms of heat, work, and mass simultaneously in open systems.
AirForceOne
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
- We know that for closed systems, energy transfer between the system and the environment can be in the form of heat or work.

-We know that for open systems or control volumes, energy transfer between the system and the environment can in the form of heat, work, or mass flow.

Let's say we have a well-insulated oven with a heating element inside. We consider the heating element and the air inside the oven to be the system. When the oven is turned on, energy is transferred in the form of work into the system. This is because the electrons flowing in the heating element crosses into the boundary.

I'm struggling to understand how the energy transferred is in the form of work instead of heat.

Questions:
1) Would the flow of electrons be considered mass flow, making it an open system?
2) If the answer to question #2 is "yes", would mass flow be considered work?

Questions not directly relevant to the problem:
1) In an open system, can energy transferred be both in the form of heat AND work?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
AirForceOne said:
1) Would the flow of electrons be considered mass flow, making it an open system?

A flow of electrons is strictly mass flow, but the electron mass flux in a problem like this is absolutely negligible compared to the mass of the system. Most physicists would assume that the system is essentially closed in terms of mass. The much more important consideration is that the power source is doing work on the system in the form of moving electrical charge.

AirForceOne said:
2) If the answer to question #2 is "yes", would mass flow be considered work?

No, mass flow is not generally equated with work. But in this case, the electrons represent a negligible amount of mass transfer and a considerable amount of electrical charge transfer.

AirForceOne said:
1) In an open system, can energy transferred be both in the form of heat AND work?

Sure; energy can enter/leave in the form of heat, work, and/or mass simultaneously.
 
For simplest example of open system loosing energy to work, consider a gas-filled cylinder with a piston as your system. When the gas inside moves the piston, it is the work done by the closed system against whatever is pushing from the other side.
 
Thanks guys! I think I understand now.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Back
Top