Energy lost by EM radiation per cm in air?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy loss of photons traveling through air at 1 atm, particularly focusing on the microwave and radio frequency ranges. Participants explore the concepts of photon absorption, atmospheric absorption, and radio wave propagation without reaching a consensus on a specific formula or approach.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about a formula for calculating energy loss of photons in air, emphasizing the need for frequency specification.
  • Another participant asserts that photons do not lose energy while traveling but can be absorbed, leading to their cessation.
  • Questions arise regarding the specific frequency range of interest, with a focus on microwave and radio frequencies.
  • It is suggested that atmospheric absorption varies significantly in the microwave region and that statistical data may be necessary for accurate calculations.
  • Participants discuss the relevance of near-field and far-field effects in calculations, particularly for distances less than a few tens of meters.
  • References are made to Free Space Path Loss (FSPL) and its application in path loss calculations for radio links, particularly in the microwave bands.
  • Link Budgets are mentioned as a comprehensive approach to account for various factors affecting signal transmission, including path loss and antenna gain.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of photon energy loss and the applicability of formulas for specific frequency ranges. There is no consensus on a single formula or method for calculating energy loss, and multiple competing perspectives remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the atmospheric conditions, such as water content, can significantly affect the attenuation of radio waves, indicating that results may vary based on these factors. The discussion also highlights the complexity of accurately modeling photon behavior in air.

NotASmurf
Messages
150
Reaction score
2
Hey all, is there a formula that can calculate the energy losy by a photon traveling through air at 1 atm per meter given frequency? Any help apreciated.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Photons do not lose energy when traveling - they are what they are.

However, a photon may be absorbed and cease to exist.
 
Do you have a particular frequency range in mind? (radio, visible, X-ray, gamma-ray, ...?)
 
If you google "atmospheric absorption" you may find out what you want. Your question is too unspecific for us to help you more.
Perhaps you are not concerned with a single photon?
 
russ_watters said:
However, a photon may be absorbed and cease to exist.
Yea, but wouldn't it be absorbed and reemitted at lower energy on average a certain number of times or would that be too capricious to be used?

jtbell said:
Do you have a particular frequency range in mind? (radio, visible, X-ray, gamma-ray, ...?)

Yea, microwave/radio
 
NotASmurf said:
Yea, microwave/radio
So you are interested in radio wave propagation. There is loads of information about that and I recommend that you google appropriately to get some background and to find out the actual questions that need answering for your problem.
The attenuation of the atmosphere varies wildly over the microwave region and also with water content. There isn't a number of formula that you can just plug into and get a reliable answer. There is a lot of Statistics involved. But there are many graphs (google Images) which could give you a clue about what to expect.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NotASmurf
Thanks :)
 
NotASmurf said:
Hey all, is there a formula that can calculate the energy losy by a photon traveling through air at 1 atm per meter given frequency? Any help apreciated.

as you have been told ... forget about individual atoms ... that's irrelevant

ohhh and for the calc's below, anything less than a few 10's of metres is also going to be irrelevant
as you would be dealing with near field effects which is isn't going to be helpful to you

if you want to learn more on that google RF propagation, near field and far field
NotASmurf said:
...... Yea, microwave/radio

OK that is relatively straightforward and is used all the time for us doing pathloss calculations between radio transmit and receive sites
say example microwave links
have a look at this site and it tells you all about FSPL ... Free Space Path Loss
http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/propagation/path-loss/free-space-formula-equation.php

This will serve well for line of sight paths and for frequencies up into the mid freq microwave bands ~ 10 GHz
after 10GHz. there are additional significant atmospheric problems to deal withcheers
Dave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NotASmurf
Thanks :)
 
  • #10
You should try to find stuff on 'Link Budgets". That takes everything into account; transmit power, feeder loss, antenna gain, path loss, spreading loss, etc etc and can give you a Carrier to noise ratio for the demodulated signal. Just what a chap needs. Path loss on its own is not actually a lot of use for designing a practical system.
 
  • #11
sophiecentaur said:
You should try to find stuff on 'Link Budgets". That takes everything into account; transmit power, feeder loss, antenna gain, path loss, spreading loss, etc etc and can give you a Carrier to noise ratio for the demodulated signal. Just what a chap needs. Path loss on its own is not actually a lot of use for designing a practical system.

the 2 popular ones are Radio Mobile and UKW Tools
I have used UKW tools for many years for my activities on 1296MHz and up to 24GHz

it takes all those factors into account :smile:Dave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K