Energy Minimization: Nature's Law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept that natural processes tend to minimize total energy, which is linked to stability. This principle is associated with the Second Law of Thermodynamics, particularly in terms of free energy, as outlined in chemistry texts. Participants question whether this tendency is a fundamental law of nature or derived from existing laws, exploring how systems achieve lower energy states. The example of a liquid spreading on a surface illustrates this concept, raising inquiries about the mechanisms behind energy minimization. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the relationship between energy states and stability in natural processes.
pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
Here is a quote from a chemistry textbook

"In nature, objects tend to change in such a way that their total energy is minimised. The lower their energy, the more stable they are, since they have less capacity to do things."

I assume they are talking about total energy=kinetic + potential energy

My question is, is this a law of nature? If so what is it called?

Or is it derived from a law? If so how? What law is it derived from?

It goes on saying "A liquid dropped to a surface will spread over the surface if by doing so it creates a surface of lower energy."

How does the liquid know it will create a surface of lower energy? Or does it just do its thing (i.e when it reaches a new surface it samples the atoms to see if it can bind with them. If they can than they do and we say before they bind they have a higher total energy than afterwards when they are collapsed on the surface hence they have lowered their energy) and in the end we find what they have done is lower their total energy.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
pivoxa15 said:
Here is a quote from a chemistry textbook

"In nature, objects tend to change in such a way that their total energy is minimised. The lower their energy, the more stable they are, since they have less capacity to do things."
Since this was in a chemistry text, it is talking about the Second Law of Thermodynamics, rewritten in terms of a free energy.

[see section titled "Special cases: Gibbs' and Helmholtz free energy"]
 
Gokul43201 said:
Since this was in a chemistry text, it is talking about the Second Law of Thermodynamics, rewritten in terms of a free energy.

[see section titled "Special cases: Gibbs' and Helmholtz free energy"]

Had I not mentioned chemistry in my OP, what would you have said?
 
Probably the same thing - it looks like how a chemistry text would word it.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top