I Energy reduction/deflection of beta particles due to isotope geometry

Aakash Sunkari
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
What is the general "degree" to which energy reduction/deflection occurs in a solid geometry vs a hollow geometry? Are there any modelling tools/software that can calculate this?
Hello all. I'm an undergraduate student looking to conduct an experiment with an isotope that undergoes beta decay.

I am curious as to the degree to which the isotope geometry will reduce the energy of/deflect beta particles emitted from the isotope. By geometry, I mean the "shape" of the isotope. For example, a solid disc of an isotope is definitely going to have more electron collisions/deflections than a thin, hollow, spherical geometry. However, I would assume that this would be to a lesser degree than particles emitted through alpha decay or fission.

Let us assume an isotope which decays 100 times in an hour with an average β energy of 2 MeV. Roughly, what percent energy reduction/deflection would we see in a solid geometry vs a hollow geometry?

I know this question is very non-specific, but I guess a general "degree" to which energy reduction/deflection occurs in a solid geometry vs a hollow geometry would be helpful. Additionally, if there are any modelling tools/software I could use to calculate this that you all are aware of, please do share.

Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on the mass, the decay energy, the absorption of the radiation in the material, the place where you measure the decays, and more. This would typically be put into a simulation software. Geant 4 is very common.
 
  • Like
Likes Aakash Sunkari
Thank you! I figured Geant4 would be the best tool to use, but wanted an outside opinion.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
Back
Top