Energy required to charge up a capacitor

AI Thread Summary
The energy required to charge a capacitor is given by the formula W = ½εrCV², indicating that a capacitor with a linear dielectric needs more energy to reach a specific potential. The discussion raises the question of whether this concept should be intuitive, with an explanation that bound charges in the dielectric cancel parts of the electric field, necessitating more overall charge. There is a consideration of whether the incoming charges experience weaker repulsion due to these canceled charges. Additionally, a correction is suggested regarding the initial equation, emphasizing the need to account for non-linear dielectric effects by treating capacitance as a function of voltage. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately calculating the energy stored in capacitors.
Maxwell1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The energy required to charge a capacitor is:

W = ½εrCV2

From this we see that a capacitor with a linear dielectric in between its plates requires a bigger energy to charge up to a given potential. My question is: Should this be intuitive?
My teacher said that it is because the parts of the electric field is canceled off by the bound charges. I guess I can understand that since you then have to pull in more charge overall. However - won't these charges being pulled in also experience a weaker repulsion due to the canceled off charges?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maxwell1 said:
The energy required to charge a capacitor is:

W = ½εrCV2

From this we see that a capacitor with a linear dielectric in between its plates requires a bigger energy to charge up to a given potential. My question is: Should this be intuitive?
My teacher said that it is because the parts of the electric field is canceled off by the bound charges. I guess I can understand that since you then have to pull in more charge overall. However - won't these charges being pulled in also experience a weaker repulsion due to the canceled off charges?


Welcome to the PF.

Your equation does not look correct. See for example this thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=170393

If you want to include non-linear dielectric effects, then it seems like you would write the capacitance as a function of voltage, like:

W = \frac{1}{2}C(V)V^2

And use an integral to calculate how much energe is stored in charging up the cap...
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top