Energy required to fracture a planetary mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the energy required to fracture a planetary mass, particularly in the context of the Moon's creation through a collision. It suggests that a significant portion of a planet's gravitational binding energy would be necessary for such fracturing, although the specifics of the calculation are complex. The conversation highlights that large planetary bodies may behave more like fluids during collisions, lacking mechanical strength at such scales. Additionally, the potential influence of atmospheric conditions and magnetic forces on the fracturing process is questioned, though fluid dynamics are considered the primary factor. The inquiry reflects a curiosity about the extreme scenarios involved in planetary collisions.
bitrex
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
Energy required to "fracture" a planetary mass

I was playing around with the Impact Effects calculator at http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/impacteffects/ and doing some thinking about the impact event scenario of the Moon's creation. The main bulk of the Earth seems to have stayed in one piece after that collision, though it lost a significant fraction of it's mass. As an intellectual exercise I was wondering how one might go about calculating the amount of energy that would be required to actually "fracture" a planetary sized mass into pieces that would not remain contiguous. I imagine it would have to be some large fraction of the body's gravitational binding energy, but as I'm not an astrophysicist I don't know what kind of starting assumptions one would make when dealing with such a problem.

I'm sure many collisions of similarly-sized large planetary bodies occurred in the early evolution of the Solar System, but perhaps large bodies don't "fracture" in the way I'm thinking and collisions are more fluid? Any insight to help satiate my curiosity would be much appreciated!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org


Correct - it's all fluid dynamics, on these scales the crust doesn't have any mechanical strength so it's like a blob of water splitting in two.
 


I'm curious about the extreme situations. Would an atmosphere (not necessarily Earth's atmosphere) also play a role here? How about a planet with a large magnetic force? Or would these be completely minor players compared to the fluid dynamics of it all?

Cheers,
--Jake
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top