What Defines the Energy Spectrum in a Hamiltonian System?

degerativpart
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the energy spectrum of a system whose Hamiltonian is
H=Ho+H'=[-(planks const)^2/2m][d^2/dx^2]+.5m(omega)^2x^2+ax^3+bx^4


I gues my big question to begin is what exactly makes up the energy spectrum. I know the equation to the first and second order perturbations but I am not sure exactly what the energy spectrum entails. Please help.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


ive figured out that H'=ax^3+bx^4

and Ho==[-(planks const)^2/2m][d^2/dx^2]+.5m(omega)^2x^2
and lambda=1 which mean ita a full perturbation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
degerativpart said:
I gues my big question to begin is what exactly makes up the energy spectrum.
In QM, "energy spectrum" is just a stupid word that they use to mean the set of possible energy eigenvalues. I personally hate that terminology; it's so misleading.



degerativpart said:
and lambda=1 which mean ita a full perturbation
I don't know what this means.
 
haha obviously I agree with you and I read that the lambda in the equation for H=Ho+(lambda)H' when equals to zero means its an unperturbed equation and when it is equal to 1 then its fully perturbed. I don't know I read it.
But I guess my next question how many energy eigenvalues are there? Does that mean I should probably only go to the second oreder corrections?
 
degerativpart said:
... how many energy eigenvalues are there?
How many eigenvalues are there for H0? Can the perturbation remove or add any, or does it just shift them?
 
Sorry, I could say that book is the question?. thank you.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top