Energy stored in a bow and arrow

  • Thread starter Thread starter vectordog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving an archer, where students calculated the speed of an arrow using two different methods. One group applied the work-energy theorem and found the arrow's speed to be 28.3 m/s, while another used the spring constant method, yielding 20 m/s. The key issue is that the spring force is not constant throughout the draw; it decreases from 500 N to zero, making the spring constant method inaccurate if not applied correctly. Both methods should yield the same result when properly executed, emphasizing the importance of understanding variable forces in the context of energy conservation. The conversation highlights common misconceptions in applying physics principles in practical scenarios.
vectordog
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
The following was a question from a Work/Energy high school test.
"3. An archer is shooting at a hay bale target. The archer pulls back on his bow string with 500 N of force to draw it back a distance of 80 cm. He releases the string, and the arrow (m= 1 Kg) flies straight to its target (neglect air resistance).
a) How fast is the arrow traveling when it leaves the bow?"
Some students used the work-energy theorem (W=delta KE in this case) and got an answer of 28.3 m/s. However, many students used the info given to determine a spring constant (k) for the bow (k = F/x), and then applied Conservation of Energy (Elastic PE = KE in this case) to the system. This yields an answer of 20 m/s for the arrow.
My question is "Why doesn't the spring constant method work?"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vectordog said:
Some students used the work-energy theorem (W=delta KE in this case) and got an answer of 28.3 m/s.
They messed up.
However, many students used the info given to determine a spring constant (k) for the bow (k = F/x), and then applied Conservation of Energy (Elastic PE = KE in this case) to the system. This yields an answer of 20 m/s for the arrow.
That's fine.
My question is "Why doesn't the spring constant method work?"
Both methods, done correctly, yield the same answer. Note that the spring force varies from 500 N at first to zero at the release. You can't just use W=Fx = 500*0.8.
 
THANKS!
I feel a little stupid now.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top