Calculating Combined Mass of Archer & Bow w/ Conservation of Momentum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the conservation of momentum, specifically calculating the combined mass of an archer and a bow after shooting an arrow. The scenario is set on a frictionless surface, where the archer recoils in the opposite direction of the arrow's motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the conservation of momentum formula to find the combined mass of the archer and bow, questioning the negative result obtained for mass and the reasoning behind treating the archer and bow as a single object.
  • Some participants question the signs used for velocity and the implications of obtaining a negative mass, suggesting that it indicates a misunderstanding of the physical situation.
  • Others explore the nature of the interaction between the arrow, bow, and archer, discussing whether a collision occurs and the assumptions made in the model.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning the assumptions made in the problem. There is a focus on clarifying the concept of momentum conservation and the physical implications of the calculations presented. No consensus has been reached, but several lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves a frictionless environment and that the treatment of the archer and bow as a single mass is based on the assumption that the archer holds the bow rigidly. There are also discussions about the nature of momentum conservation beyond traditional collision scenarios.

Balsam
Messages
226
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


After shooting a 28g arrow with an initial velocity of 92m/s[forward], an archer standing on a frictionless surface travels in the opposite direction at a speed of 0.039m/s. Calculate the combined mass of the archer and the bow.

Given: **Subscript of 1 indicates values for the arrow and subscript of 2 indicates values for the archer

m1=0.028kg
vi1=92m/s[forward]
vf1=0m/s

vi1=0.039m/s[backward]
vf2=0m/s

Homework Equations


m1vi1+m2vi2=m1vf1+m2vf2

The Attempt at a Solution


The only way this problem works is if you treat the archer and the bow as one body/one object and using the above formula and values, solve for m2:

(0.029)(92)+m2(0.039)=0
2.576=-m2(0.039)
-66.05128205kg=m2

I got the correct answer aside from the negative sign in front of my answer. Why is my answer negative? Does that mean I did something wrong?

Also, why do you treat the archer and the bow as one collective object? I thought the law of conservation of momentum, which gives us the equation I used, applied to situations when two objects collide in an isolated system. If so, then what collision occurs in this problem; how are both the bow and the archer colliding with the arrow?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With your initial and final you describe a fully inelastic collision of an arrow and an archer plus bow. Rather fatal for the archer ...

Is it strange you get a negative mass ? The recoil from shooting the arrow makes the archer go backwards (that's why it's called recoil) wrt the arrow ! Yet you have the same sign for both speeds !
 
BvU said:
With your initial and final you describe a fully inelastic collision of an arrow and an archer plus bow. Rather fatal for the archer ...

Is it strange you get a negative mass ? The recoil from shooting the arrow makes the archer go backwards (that's why it's called recoil) wrt the arrow ! Yet you have the same sign for both speeds !

I thought that it was okay not to plug in negative signs indicating direction for vector values when doing calculations to find a scalar value, like mass.
 
Well, apparently you thought wrong: a negative mass is unphysical !
 
BvU said:
Well, apparently you thought wrong: a negative mass is unphysical !
Good to know
 
BvU said:
With your initial and final you describe a fully inelastic collision of an arrow and an archer plus bow. Rather fatal for the archer ...

Is it strange you get a negative mass ? The recoil from shooting the arrow makes the archer go backwards (that's why it's called recoil) wrt the arrow ! Yet you have the same sign for both speeds !
But why are the bow and archer one mass?
 
Balsam said:
But why are the bow and archer one mass?
Because the archer is assumed to hold the bow rigidly. In a different model, the archer could let go of bow and arrow at the same instant. The arrow would travel a smallish distance one way, and the bow a smaller distance the other.
Note that with a firearm that second model is closer to what happens. The impulse is so great that it is not possible (and maybe not a good idea to try) to hold the weapon rigidly.
 
haruspex said:
Because the archer is assumed to hold the bow rigidly. In a different model, the archer could let go of bow and arrow at the same instant. The arrow would travel a smallish distance one way, and the bow a smaller distance the other.
Note that with a firearm that second model is closer to what happens. The impulse is so great that it is not possible (and maybe not a good idea to try) to hold the weapon rigidly.
What is the collision that happens, the bow and the arrow are not colliding, they were already in contact.
 
Balsam said:
What is the collision that happens, the bow and the arrow are not colliding, they were already in contact.
Conservation of momentum is not limited to collisions.
 
  • #10
Balsam said:
What is the collision that happens
Physically the time reversal of a collision happens: first they are together (sum of momenta = 0) and then they separate -- without any external forces acting. So the center of mass does not accelerate and sum of momenta remains zero.

Newton 3: action = - reaction makes that afterwards the individual momenta are equal and opposite.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K