Energy to separate one molecule of water from a single neighbour

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around estimating the energy required to separate one water molecule from its neighbors in ice, with a calculation suggesting approximately 4.5 E-20 J. The reasoning involves using the total heat needed to convert ice to vapor and factoring in the number of neighboring molecules. There is a debate about the validity of multiplying by two in the calculation, as each molecule is bonded to four neighbors, and the concept of "outermost bonds" is clarified as non-existent in the molecular structure of ice. Participants emphasize that the structure of ice is uniform, with each molecule consistently bonded to four others. Overall, the conversation seeks to refine the calculation method and clarify misconceptions about molecular bonding in ice.
johnconnor
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Question:

The amount of heat required to convert 1g of ice into vapour is approx. 3000J. Estimate the energy required to separate one molecule from a single neighbour, assuming that in ice, each H2O molecule has four nearest neighbours. [Mr(water) = 18)

My reasoning:

3000 x 2 / [1/18 mole x NA x 4] = 4.5 E-20 J

Because each molecule is attracted to 4 other molecules -- hence the product of the number of water molecules with 4. And since I'm looking for the energy required to separate one molecule from a single neighbour, I multiplied the division by 2.

Is this reasoning valid? Haven't we ignored the unused bonds of the water molecules at the outermost part of the ice cube? How significant is it to take into consideration those unused bonds?

If the reasoning is wrong, could anyone please point to me the proper way of attempting the question (rather than getting a fortuitous answer)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
Bump?
 
I think the reasoning is almost correct. I don't understand why you multiplied by two, though. Each molecule has four neighbors. And the term you get without multiplying the two, is the binding energy between them for each neighbor.

Also, there are no 'outermost bonds'. It is somewhat like a football structure, closed on itself, so each ice molecule is joined to four others.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top