Engineer vs. Math: Solving the Calculus Conundrum

  • Thread starter Thread starter redgoat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineer
AI Thread Summary
Electrical engineers should be proficient in solving calculus problems, particularly those encountered in their coursework, although some may find certain problems more challenging. Mastery of calculus is essential as it underpins many concepts in electrical engineering. Taking additional applied math courses is recommended to enhance problem-solving skills. While it's acknowledged that some calculus problems may remain unsolvable, a strong grasp of the fundamentals is crucial for effective engineering practice. Ultimately, personal effort and commitment to mastering these skills are key to becoming a successful engineer.
redgoat
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Should every electrical engineer be able to figure every calculus problem out?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you are referring to problems given in calculus courses required for an EE program, I feel an EE would be able to solve them all (some problems may take more time than others, that's all).

Perhaps, depending on the instructor, some may challenge a student by throwing in a few tougher questions.
 
To be a good EE, you should take some extra applied math courses, especially on methods of solving problems. Ultimately, its not just about the minimum you need to get by, but your personal best.
 
Yes, Because The Calculus Is One Of The Mathematical Methods Used To Described The Phenomenon In The Field Of Electricity...
 
Should a tennis player be able to return every serve?
This question has no answer either.

There will always be a calculus problem you can't solve.
But without a serious effort to master the fundamentals of engineering
(and calculus is one of these) you will not become an effective engineer.
 
Antiphoton is ryt!
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top