Schools Engineering Degree: College Reputation Matters?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sambony
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    College
AI Thread Summary
Choosing a college based on proximity to mountains for skiing and mountain biking can impact long-term career prospects in engineering. Attending a well-regarded institution like Cornell or Princeton may open more doors, but success ultimately depends on personal commitment and performance, regardless of the school's reputation. Attending a less prestigious school does not preclude success, but it may require more effort to achieve the same opportunities. It's essential to align college choices with personal and career goals, considering the balance between academics and extracurricular passions. Ultimately, the decision should reflect a clear understanding of one's priorities and aspirations for the future.
Sambony
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. This is my first post here and am looking for a little college wisdom in the engineering area.

Here's my dilemma:
I'd like to go to a school that is near mountains. I know, I know...I shouldn't be choosing a college because I want to be able to ski and mountain bike there. But where I live now these are right out my back door (skiing is pretty much what I live for in the winter) and the problem is that there seem to be very few decent schools that fit this category (maybe I'm missing some?). I just can't seem to convince myself that it is necessary to give up things that I love doing for four years just to go to a better school, unless I'll regret the decision later on or the difference is like night and day (is it?).

So here's my question:
How much of a difference is there going to be between getting a degree in engineering at a school with a very good reputation versus something more average? More specifically, let's say I went to a school such as CU-Boulder when I could probably get into something more similar to Cornell or Princeton. Am I going to be screwing myself in the long run? How different are the educations going to be for someone going for an engineering degree?

Any advice appreciated.

Thanks,
Sam
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sambony said:
Am I going to be screwing myself in the long run? How different are the educations going to be for someone going for an engineering degree?

Let me say that going to a particular undergrad institution will not absolutely close many doors for a person compared to going to an Ivy, but those doors may require a lot more commitment and outstanding performance to open. If you were asking, "I was only accepted at (state college X), am I screwed?" my answer would definitely be no. I would just say that there are more challenges.

From your post, it sounds like you are simply not committed to getting the best possible career for yourself that you can. This is fine, but it is this, and not the school, that will determine where you end up when you graduate. If you are at (state college X) and spend all of your time skiing, and if you don't choose to sacrifice some of your life outside of school, you will disadvantage yourself on the job market. It sounds like you may be okay with this fact though. The jobs you won't be eligible for are the jobs that will require long hours and strong performance and commitment. If you aren't willing to put in the time now, why would you want to after graduation? Everyone has to draw the line somewhere.

Maybe you should think about what your goals are for college and your career. Then you can decide what you need to do to get there from here.

Just to add about goals... if you are willing to work hard and make sacrifices, potential options for an undergrad from Princeton, for example, would include going to grad school anywhere you want. Want to be a hotshot lawyer? Doctor? Professor? Want to make millions on Wall Street or advise CEOs as a management consultant? Design ships for NASA? Advise Congress on energy policy? Those doors are still open until you close them.
 
Last edited:
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top