Engineering Math: Laplace Transform

Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies the process of simplifying an equation using partial fractions, not Laplace transforms. Participants explain how to set the left-hand side (LHS) to A/(3s+1) + B/(3s-1) and solve for constants A and B. It is emphasized that the LHS does not need to equal zero for this method. Several resources for further explanation of partial fractions are suggested. The conversation concludes with participants expressing gratitude for the clarification.
whatphysics
Messages
29
Reaction score
2
Not homework question, just need clarification and explanation. How did the person get from the left equation to the right side. I know he's just simplifying. But he didn't include steps and I've been trying to work out how to no avail. Any help on how this person simplified the LHS to RHS? Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5436.JPG
    IMG_5436.JPG
    18.3 KB · Views: 453
Engineering news on Phys.org
Not a Laplace transform it is an algebraic separation of constants. I forget what they call it.

Set LHS to A/(3s+1) +B/(3s-1) then solve for A and B for values when LHS=0.
 
  • Like
Likes whatphysics
I think it is called partial fractions, as R.PR.R said (except that LHS does not need to be 0).
You can find several explanations of the technique on the web.
 
  • Like
Likes whatphysics
Merlin3189 said:
I think it is called partial fractions, as R.PR.R said (except that LHS does not need to be 0).
You can find several explanations of the technique on the web.
That's it Merlin! Thanks. The name eluded me.
 
RomegaPRogRess said:
Not a Laplace transform it is an algebraic separation of constants. I forget what they call it.

Set LHS to A/(3s+1) +B/(3s-1) then solve for A and B for values when LHS=0.
Great thanks!
 
RomegaPRogRess said:
That's it Merlin! Thanks. The name eluded me.
Merlin3189 said:
I think it is called partial fractions, as R.PR.R said (except that LHS does not need to be 0).
You can find several explanations of the technique on the web.
Great thanks!
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K