Engineering Statics (Vector Questions)

  • Thread starter Thread starter xtrubambinoxpr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineering Statics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in engineering statics, specifically focusing on vector components and the use of the parallelogram method for vector addition. Participants are exploring how to accurately represent forces and their components relative to defined axes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the challenges of drawing a parallelogram for vector addition and seek advice on alternative methods, such as breaking vectors into components. There is also consideration of angle relationships in triangles formed by the vectors.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the relationships between angles and components. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of trigonometry to find components relative to the defined axes, but there is still uncertainty about applying these methods to new images presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a specific problem setup that defines axes and requires the use of the parallelogram law for vector addition. There is mention of difficulties in visual representation affecting the understanding of the problem.

xtrubambinoxpr
Messages
86
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Attached below

Homework Equations



I am having a problem because the solutions manual does the parallelogram method and stupid me I cannot draw the parallelogram correctly. Specifically my drawings are off a bit. and it throws me off every time. the last one I had vector (FR) completely wrong because the damn figure.

The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted to draw a parallelogram but i suck at it and want some advice / help. If anyone has any suggestions. I am better on doing it into components but how would you do this in components being the axis is slanted.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-01-30 at 2.00.21 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-01-30 at 2.00.21 AM.png
    8.3 KB · Views: 657
Physics news on Phys.org
They defined the axis for you in this problem, and want you to find the components of the force relative to those axis. So what you can do is find the angle the force makes with respect to the u-v axis and use trig to find the components.
 
LeFerret said:
They defined the axis for you in this problem, and want you to find the components of the force relative to those axis. So what you can do is find the angle the force makes with respect to the u-v axis and use trig to find the components.

so would i be right to say the right side has a triangle with degree measures 45, 30(alt interior angles, and 105?
 
xtrubambinoxpr said:
so would i be right to say the right side has a triangle with degree measures 45, 30(alt interior angles, and 105?

If I understand you correctly, you're saying that the angle F1 makes to the v-axis is 45degrees?
 
well 180 in a line.. so 180 - 105 = 75.. for the "quadrant III" let's say.. opposite is 75 total.. but you have 30 given. so that makes the extra angle left 45. so the alt interior angle tells me that there will be a 45, 30, 105 triangle
 
xtrubambinoxpr said:
well 180 in a line.. so 180 - 105 = 75.. for the "quadrant III" let's say.. opposite is 75 total.. but you have 30 given. so that makes the extra angle left 45. so the alt interior angle tells me that there will be a 45, 30, 105 triangle

Correct. From that you can find the angle F2 makes relative to the v-axis as well and from that you can determine the components of the force with respect to the u-v axis.
 
LeFerret said:
Correct. From that you can find the angle F2 makes relative to the v-axis as well and from that you can determine the components of the force with respect to the u-v axis.
Ok cool thanks! One last question
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1391067296.376356.jpg


The new image I attached is so blank. Would I use the same method?
 
xtrubambinoxpr said:
Ok cool thanks! One last question
View attachment 66145

The new image I attached is so blank. Would I use the same method?

Hmm, I'm not quite sure on this one, I would say no but don't take my word for it. What I would consider though is using the parallelogram law to create a force triangle. I can't really offer any tips on it, just draw A+B, then translate them accordingly to make the parallelogram.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K