Entanglement in scattering processes

limarodessa
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Dear participants of a forum.

The phenomenon of quantum entanglement arises only when there is the INTERACTION between two objects of a microcosm.

However there is a question:

What is such INTERACTION?

Whether the scattering matrix is the key moment in such interaction?:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-matrix

Or the main thing is something another?

Whether spins of particles should be bindingly antiparallel?

How I must understand the situation when the both particles have a zero spin ?

Whether it is bindingly to regard spins of particles in situation of quantum entanglement ?

Here some resources:

http://www.iwce.org/fileadmin/IWCE_...nanohub.org/papers/posters/P02-04-Bordone.pdf

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0810/0810.4093v3.pdf

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0503/0503183v1.pdf
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0109/0109045v2.pdf
http://users.aber.ac.uk/rog/scat.pdf
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0506/0506212v1.pdf
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0710/0710.5776v1.pdf
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0712/0712.0014v2.pdf
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0607/0607181v3.pdf
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0509/0509013v3.pdf
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0611/0611230v2.pdf
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0708/0708.2388v1.pdf
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0601/0601177v1.pdf
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0503/0503131v1.pdf
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0609/0609217v1.pdf

Also, dear participants and visitors of a forum, I ask that you excused me - my English is bad. I am from Ukraine.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
limarodessa said:
Dear participants of a forum.

The phenomenon of quantum entanglement arises only when there is the INTERACTION between two objects of a microcosm.

However there is a question:

What is such INTERACTION?

Whether the scattering matrix is the key moment in such interaction?:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-matrix

Or the main thing is something another?

Whether spins of particles should be bindingly antiparallel?

Well, you know that entanglement arises in conjunction with the conservation laws. I.e. conservation of quantum observables. Total momentum, spin, charge, etc. Conservation of these is critical to scattering analysis. So you would expect entanglement in a scattering event, although you won't get the same types of particles out in all cases. The particle count may differ as well. Because of these, your state will have a lot of terms corresponding to the possible outcomes. Trying to actually observe entanglement in that situation is very difficult and in some cases, impossible.
 
DrChinese said:
"...although you won't get the same types of particles out in all cases. The particle count may differ as well..."

First of all I should thank you that you have answered my post.

If you allow, I would like to ask to you some questions.

You write:

"...although you won't get the same types of particles out in all cases..."

If it is possible, explain in more details that you have in view of, please.

Further you write:

"...The particle count may differ as well..."

Also I would be very grateful to you if you have explained in more details this moment. What do you mean when you write "particle count"?

I ask you to excuse me in that case if my questions are naive or I badly translate from English.

Thanks.
 
limarodessa said:
First of all I should thank you that you have answered my post.

If you allow, I would like to ask to you some questions.

You write:



If it is possible, explain in more details that you have in view of, please.

Further you write:



Also I would be very grateful to you if you have explained in more details this moment. What do you mean when you write "particle count"?

I ask you to excuse me in that case if my questions are naive or I badly translate from English.

Thanks.

It depends on whether we are talking about high energy or low energy scattering. As the input energy goes up, the output particles can be all kinds of things, as you might expect in a particle accelerator.

You may have intended to refer to low energy scattering only, in which the scattering is electron-electron or similar. In those cases, there is still conservation so there can be degrees of entanglement. The nature of the entanglement will be a function of what you know about the particles to begin with. If you know starting momentum, you will know ending momentum too (since it is the same) and there will be momentum entanglement.
 
DrChinese said:
It depends on whether we are talking about high energy or low energy scattering. As the input energy goes up, the output particles can be all kinds of things, as you might expect in a particle accelerator.

You may have intended to refer to low energy scattering only, in which the scattering is electron-electron or similar. In those cases, there is still conservation so there can be degrees of entanglement. The nature of the entanglement will be a function of what you know about the particles to begin with. If you know starting momentum, you will know ending momentum too (since it is the same) and there will be momentum entanglement.

Thanks. I figure that your answer is clear for me.

Now, if you will allow, I would like to ask following questions:

Whether spins of particles should be bindingly antiparallel?

How I must understand the situation when the both particles, which are interacting, have a zero spin ?

Whether it is bindingly to regard spins of particles in situation of quantum entanglement ?
 
limarodessa said:
Thanks. I figure that your answer is clear for me.

Now, if you will allow, I would like to ask following questions:

Whether spins of particles should be bindingly antiparallel?

How I must understand the situation when the both particles, which are interacting, have a zero spin ?

Whether it is bindingly to regard spins of particles in situation of quantum entanglement ?

In scattering, maybe they are always anti-parallel - not really certain as this is not my strong side. They are conserved so the question will usually be: what do you know about input spin?

As to quantum entanglement: there are situations in which spin is not entangled even though there are other observables which are entangled. So the answer is no. Spin is still conserved.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...
Back
Top