Entire number make up the order of magnitude or just the decimal place

  • Thread starter Thread starter billabuwl50
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnitude
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the entire number or just the decimal places determine the order of magnitude. Participants question the definition of "order of magnitude" and its application to specific examples, such as 3.4 and 0.1. There is confusion about whether both numbers belong to the same order of magnitude due to their decimal placement or if their size differences categorize them differently. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in understanding how order of magnitude relates to numerical values. Ultimately, the distinction between size and decimal placement is crucial in defining order of magnitude.
billabuwl50
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
So, does the entire number make up the order of magnitude or just the decimal places. I don't understand
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What a strange statement! What number are you talking about? What "decimal places"? Do you know the definition of "order of magnitude"?
 
For example if I have 3.4 and .1, are these numbers of the same order of magnitude because they both go into the tenths place 10^-1, or are they different orders of magnitude because 3.4 is much larger than .1?
 

Thread 'Fermat's Last Theorem'

Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
View full post »

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

I On base-b expansion of nonnegative reals
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Decimal Precision - Multiplying, Rounding, and Adding
Replies
8
Views
2K
Why Do We Add Zeroes When Calculating the LCM and HCF of Decimals?
Replies
8
Views
7K
B How to handle significant digits of exact values?
Replies
12
Views
2K
MHB How to Calculate Percent Correct: 87.5% - Understanding Decimals and Rounding
Replies
12
Views
3K
Ruler measurements and knowing how many decimal places to include
Replies
9
Views
2K
What function was used for current record of decimal places of EM cnst
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Alternating Harmonic Numbers are cool, spread the word!
Replies
4
Views
2K
Consideration of number of significant figures in experimental quantities
Replies
6
Views
959
B The definition of “vector” in math and physics
Replies
3
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top