B Entropy, irreversability, and the arrow of time

entropy1
Messages
1,232
Reaction score
72
It is said that entropy causes an arrow of time. However, how about the irreversability of a measurement like electron spin. When measured a certain spin, the previous value gets lost. So does that also require an arrow of time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any device measuring such things has a large enough number of mechanical degrees of freedom for thermodynamic concepts to apply to the composite electron-device system.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
A measurement involves (or seems to involve) two distinct processes:
  1. Through ordinary interactions between the measured system and the measuring device, the two systems become entangled. This step is presumably described completely by the Schrodinger equation (or something analogous).
  2. One of the macroscopically distinguishable "pointer states" is selected (or realized, or actualized, or chosen) according to the Born rule.
The first part process is reversible. The second is not. But we don't actually understand the second process, or even whether it happens (in Many-Worlds and Bohmian interpretations, it never happens).
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost and entropy1
entropy1 said:
It is said that entropy causes an arrow of time. However, how about the irreversability of a measurement like electron spin. When measured a certain spin, the previous value gets lost. So does that also require an arrow of time?

Yes. QM assumes an arrow of time because a measurement must be irreversible.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and entropy1
entropy1 said:
It is said that entropy causes an arrow of time. However, how about the irreversability of a measurement like electron spin. When measured a certain spin, the previous value gets lost. So does that also require an arrow of time?
Irrespective of one's favored interpretation of QM, it is now generally accepted that measurement always involves decoherence caused by interaction with a large number of degrees of freedom in the environment. It is this decoherence that involves the increase of entropy in the measurement process.
 
  • Like
Likes hilbert2 and bhobba
Demystifier said:
Irrespective of one's favored interpretation of QM, it is now generally accepted that measurement always involves decoherence caused by interaction with a large number of degrees of freedom in the environment. It is this decoherence that involves the increase of entropy in the measurement process.

Exactly - its basically the conclusion reached in this book I recently read:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01L7NB4QC/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Its rather subtle though.

Thanks
Bill
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top