Entropy of canonical ensemble - invariant wrt energy shift?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The entropy of a canonical ensemble remains invariant when all energy levels are shifted by a constant value, E_0. This conclusion is derived from the partition function Z, where the transformation leads to unchanged phase space volume, thus maintaining the number of accessible microstates. The entropy S is defined as S = k_B ln(Ω(Ē)), where Ω(Ē) represents the volume in phase space, which does not vary with uniform energy shifts. Consequently, alterations in energy levels do not affect the system's entropy unless they stem from changes in the Hamiltonian due to interactions or external fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of canonical ensembles in statistical mechanics
  • Familiarity with the partition function and its significance (Z = ∑ e^{-\beta E_i})
  • Knowledge of phase space and microstates (Ω(Ē))
  • Basic concepts of Hamiltonian mechanics and energy distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of energy shifts in canonical ensembles using statistical mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between Hamiltonian changes and entropy variations
  • Investigate the role of heat and work in thermodynamic systems
  • Learn about the derivation and applications of the partition function in different ensembles
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of entropy and energy distributions in physical systems.

BjarkeTN
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a short question which I have been discussing with a fellow student and a professor. The question (which is not a homework question!), is as follows:

If you shift all the energies [itex]E_i \to E_i + E_0[/itex] (thus also shifting the mean energy [itex]U \to U + E_0[/itex]), does the entropy of the system remain the same?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
##Z = \sum e^{-\beta E'_i} = e^{-\beta E_0}\sum e^{-\beta E_i} \\ \Rightarrow \ln Z' = \ln Z-\beta E_0 \\ \Rightarrow\bar{E}'=-\partial_{\beta}\ln Z' = E + E_0 \\ \Rightarrow S' = k_B(\ln Z' + \beta \bar{E}) = k_B(\ln Z - \beta E_0 + \beta E + \beta E_0) = S##

Now why doesn't the entropy change? Well remember ##S = k_B \ln \Omega(\bar{E})## and ##\Omega(\bar{E})## is the volume between ##\bar{E}## and ##\bar{E} + \delta\bar{E}## in phase space i.e. of an infinitesimal energy shell of microstates accessible to the system. So if you shift all energy eigenvalues of the system by the same constant, thus shifting the average energy by the same amount, then the volume in phase space in between two infinitesimally separated values of average energy will remain unchanged.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
To give another view to WannabeNewton's very good explanation, one could say that a shift in energy levels of a system will not alter the occupation of the levels and therefore not change the entropy of the system. I guess your question seems like a specific case of the consequence that a perturbation to a system in the form of heat changes the distribution/occupation of levels without changing the energy levels themselves, whereas a perturbation in the form of reversible work changes the energy levels without affecting their distribution.
In other words the changes in energy levels of a system must come from a change to the Hamiltonian i.e. change in interactions between the particles or interaction with external fields, so from the effect of work on a system, and this doesn't change entropy. A change in entropy arises from the effect of heat and this changes the energy of the system by repopulating to higher energy levels without changing the levels themselves (doesn't change the form of the Hamiltonian).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
1K