Epsilon-Delta Definition to prove the L'Hopital's Rule

prasannaworld
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Okay I wish to try to construct an Epsilon-Delta Definition to prove the L'Hopital's Rule (0/0 form). Please correct me if I am wrong.

http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/53340.html

I found the above site. Scrolling down one would the proof.

I can follow how an x constraint is constructed. But then for the y constraint, I cannot seem to completely follow the proof when it says:

lim f'(x0)/g'(x0) = L
x0->b-

Any help/guidance will be appreciated
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


For a continuous function limF(x)_{x\rightarrow a}=F(a). In the use of L'Hopital's Rule, we can assume continuity because we are able to employ derivatives.

So that, in general for continuous functions, we can see that lim\frac{F(x)}{G(x)}_{x\rightarrow a}=\frac{F(a)}{G(a)} However, in the case of 0/0, we have an underfined quality and need to go further with it, as shown in your reference.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top