Equal sets and bijective correspondence

  • Thread starter Thread starter mizunoami
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
mizunoami
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If [n] and [m] are equal, then they are bijective correspondent.

I define f \subset\{(n,m)\mid n \in [n], m\in [m]\}. Suppose [n]=[m]. Let(n,m_1),(n,m_2)\in f. Because [n]=[m], then m_1=m_2. So for all n \in [n], there exists a unique m\in [m] such that f(n)=m. So f is a function.

Next I want to prove f is surjective and injective. But I'm stuck. How can I make use of the supposition [n]=[m] to prove surjectivity and injectivity?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean "equal" or "equivalent"? In order to be equal, sets A and B must be identical- they contain exactly the same elements. In order to be equivalent, they must have the same cardinality- contain exactly the same number of elements. In either case, there is an obvious bijection.
 
I mean equal - so both sets contain the same elements.

Yeah, there is obviously a bijection. But how can I show that using a rigorous mathematical proof?
 
The obvious way- show that f, from [m] to [n], defined by f(x)= x, is both "one-to-one" and "onto". And that should be easy- if f(a)= f(b), what must be true of a and b? Let c be a member of [n]. What member of [m] is mapped to c?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top