Equalities for Paulimatrix averages

  • Thread starter Thread starter Funzies
  • Start date Start date
Funzies
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I've come across this a few times:

<S_x^2> = <S_y^2>=<S_z^2>=\hbar^2/4

But I can't seem to understand why this holds, as <S_x>, <S_y> and <S_z> sometimes give really strange values for a random spinor, with no correlation at all.

Can anyone explain this to me? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If S_x=\frac{\hbar}{2}\sigma_x, then S_x^2=\hbar^2/4, and the same for other components, thus your formula holds even without expectation values.

You should not mix &lt;S_x&gt;^2 with &lt;S_x^2&gt;. These are different things. If you jump to the left (-1) and to the right (+1) then the average can be zero, but the average of the squares will be >0.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top