Equating Heat and Einstein's equation confusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter pjbeierle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Heat
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the mass-energy equivalence formula and its application to heat and temperature changes. It highlights that the mass in the equation M*c² represents the energy equivalent mass, while the mass in the heat equation M*cm*ΔT refers to the rest mass of the substance, which are fundamentally different. The mass does not cancel out because they represent different concepts. To properly relate the two, the equation should be adjusted to Δm * c² = m * cm * ΔT. This clarification emphasizes the need to distinguish between energy mass and rest mass when performing such calculations.
pjbeierle
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I should start by saying that I am a bit embarissed by asking such a silly question
By simply equating the mass-energy formula with the temperature dependence of heat...

M*c2 = M* cm *ΔT

it strikes me as odd that the mass cancels,

c2 = cm *ΔT

I was doing this in order to calculate how much mass is gained by heating say a cup of water up by a specific amount (I know it would be very small, but I was just curious of the order of magnitude). But it seems I cannot do this, so there must be something obvious I am missing.
 
Science news on Phys.org
They don't cancel because they are two different masses. On the left is the mass equivalent of the energy and on the right is the rest mass of the water.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
russ_watters said:
They don't cancel because they are two different masses. On the left is the mass equivalent of the energy and on the right is the rest mass of the water.
...or to put it another way, the equation should be
\Delta m \, c^2 = m \, c_m \, \Delta T
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
16K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
4K
Back
Top