Equation calculating the amplitude of a particle

  • Thread starter Thread starter Crazy Tosser
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitude Particle
Crazy Tosser
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
If I am right, it's supposed to be this:

When a particle moves from r_{1} to r_{2}, the amplitude of the move can be written as:

\langle r_{2} | r_{1} \rangle = \frac{e^{ipr_{12}/\hbar}}{r_{12}}

where r_{1} and r_{2} are vectors of particle's position (I think?).
and r_{12} = r_{2}-r_{1} and is the scalar( I think again?)

So my question is.. how can you substitute vectors to get a numerical value for the equation above?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone? =[
 
I'm not familiar with this equation, but it looks like you'd have to know:
The particle's momentum, p
The distance between the two points, r_12

Then just plug the numbers in.

Edit added:
In the exponent, that looks like the dot product of 2 vectors, so you need not only the distance r_12, you actually need the displacement vector r2-r1. Likewise, you need to know the direction of the momentum.

I think it's a scalar, |r_12|, in the denominator of your expression.
 
Last edited:
I didn't actually recognize the expression up to now. It seems the Green's function for the free Schrodinger equation. See:

http://www.physics.thetangentbundle.net/wiki/Quantum_mechanics/Lippmann-Schwinger_equation

In this case the Green's function is actually isotropic, and so the product in the exponent is the product of a scalar and another scalar.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Redbelly98 said:
I'm not familiar with this equation, but it looks like you'd have to know:
The particle's momentum, p
The distance between the two points, r_12

Then just plug the numbers in.

Edit added:
In the exponent, that looks like the dot product of 2 vectors, so you need not only the distance r_12, you actually need the displacement vector r2-r1. Likewise, you need to know the direction of the momentum.

I think it's a scalar, |r_12|, in the denominator of your expression.

Yes, I just realized that, it was hard to see the bold in that equation (it's very small)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top