Equation of a plane (General and Point-Normal Form)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Damascus Road
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Plane
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the equation of a plane given three points in space, specifically through the context of linear algebra. Participants explore different methods for deriving the equation, including the general form and point-normal form, and discuss the implications of their approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a system of equations derived from the general form of the plane equation and asks about the inclusion of the variable d in the matrix.
  • Another participant emphasizes the necessity of including all variables in the matrix and provides an augmented matrix representation of the system.
  • There is a suggestion to use Gaussian elimination as a method for solving the system of equations.
  • A different approach is proposed using the point-normal form, involving the cross product to determine the normal vector of the plane.
  • Participants discuss the origin of the coefficients, particularly the "1/16" factor, and how it relates to the solutions derived from the equations.
  • One participant successfully calculates the normal vector using the cross product but expresses confusion regarding the absence of the "1/16" factor in their calculations.
  • Another participant points out a potential error in determinant calculations and encourages rechecking the values obtained.
  • There is a discussion about the choice of point used in the equation and whether it affects the outcome.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for solving the problem, as multiple approaches are discussed, and some participants express confusion about specific calculations and results.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty regarding the derivation of certain coefficients and the relationship between different forms of the plane equation. There are also unresolved questions about the determinants used in the cross product method.

Damascus Road
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
Hey all,
I'm trying to figure out an example from my Linear Algebra Book:

The question is as follows:
Find the equation of the plane passing through the points P1(1,2,-1), P2(2,3,1) and P3(3,-1,2)

It goes on to say it must satisfy this system, which is fine:

1 + 2b - c + d = 0
2a + 3b + c + d = 0
3a - b + 2c + d = 0

Then it just says, "solving for this system gives [tex]a=\frac{9}{16}t, b=-\frac{1}{16}t, c= \frac{5}{16}t, d=t[/tex] "

To solve this system, would one include the d's in the matrix or leave them out?
What method would you recommend for solving this? (and then I can give it a shot)

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You forgot to mention that you are assuming the equation of the plane (or any plane) can be written ax+ by+ cz+ d= 0! I wondered where a, b, c, and d came from!

Yes, of course you have to include d! You have to include all the variables. The equations you give are equivalent to
2b- c+ d= -1
2a+ 3b+ c+ d= 0
3a- b+ 2c+ d= 0
The augmented matrix for that system of equations is
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}0 & 2 & -1 & 1 & -1 \\ 2 & 3 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 3 & -1 & 1 & 1 & 0\end{array}\right][/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Am I correct in thinking the Gaussian elimination would be the best choice, or is there a more efficient way I'm missing?
 
I recommend you instead use the point-normal form instead.

To find the normal, you can take the cross product n = (p2-p1)X(p3-p2). Then the condition that the normal is perpendicular to vectors on the plane means that (x-c)*n = 0 for points x and c on the plane.

Here is a diagram:
http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/7929/pointnormalformpy3.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Awesome, Maze! But where does the 1/16 come from then?
 
Have you tried
1) Solving the system of equations?
2) Reducing the matrix I gave you?
3) Taking the cross product as Maze suggested?

Doing any of those things will show you where the "1/16" came from. The point is that you have three equations in 4 unknown coefficients. You can solve for any three in terms of the other one. Here they chose to solve for a, b, c in terms of d and use d as the parametr.

Actually, it doesn't matter. If you define s to be "t/16", then, a= 9s, b= -s, c= 5s and d= 16s.
 
Yes! Doing the cross product I obtained (9,1,-5), lacking the denominator I need.
 
Hmm. here's what i get
p1=(1,2,1), p2=(2,3,1), p3 = (3,-1,2)

p2-p1=(1,1,0), p3-p2=(1,-4,1)

n = (p2-p1)X(p3-p2) = i(1-0) + j(0-1) + k(-4-1) = (1,-1,-5)

0 = n*(x-p1) = (1,-1,-5)*(x1-1, x2-2, x3-1) = x1-1-x2+2-5*x3+5
0 = x1 - x2 - 5*x3 + 6

This checks out with the 3 points, so it should be good.
 
Hey Maze,
sorry, I'm not following your last two steps.

What I did is set it up as a 2x3 matrix and solved for the three components.
I used the easy method of "crossing" out a column and then finding the three determinants.

This gives me the three numbers from before, but not the 1/16th...
 
  • #10
Maybe it will be easier to help if you can post your work so far.
 
  • #11
Sure,

I'm just using a trick from my linear algebra book:

taking the cross product of a 2x3

1 1 0
1 -4 1

The trick is, to get the x portion, cross out the first column and take the determinant. For the y, cross out the second column, for the z, cross out the third.

The three determinants I get are 9, 1, -5
 
  • #12
Recheck the determinants,
[tex]det(\begin{matrix}1 & 0 \\ -4 & 1\end{matrix}) = 1*1-(-4*0) = 1[/tex]
 
  • #13
Wait, sorry - I accidentally used your value. The first row should be 1 1 2.

(P1 is 1,2, -1)

Using that, I get the values I showed.
 
  • #14
Yeah ok with p1 = (1,2,-1) that looks good. So what's the problem then?
 
  • #15
Is there a problem with doing it my way, as I do not get the 1/16th still... or am I forgetting something?
 
  • #16
Oh, i see. Just recall

ax + by + c = 0

is the same as

ax/16 + bx/16 + c/16 = 0
 
  • #17
I'm confused...

when I wrote the solutions with 1/16th in my first post - that came from an unsolved answer in the book. I do not know how its obtained solving for my determinants,etc.
 
  • #18
You got the normal by cross product: n = (9,1,-5)

Now since the normal is perpendicular to any vector parallel to the plane, and since (x-p1) is parallel to the plane if x is on the plane, we have

0 = n*(x-p1)

0 = (9,1,-5)*((x1,x2,x3)-(1,2,-1)) = (9,1,-5)*(x1-1,x2-2,x3+1)
0 = 9*x1 - 9 + x2 - 2 - 5*x3 - 5
0 = 9*x1 + x2 - 5*x3 - 16

So there you go, that's the equation for the plane. You could divide the whole thing by 16 to get the results the book talks about.
 
  • #19
Thanks again, maze.

If all 3 points are on the plane, what makes you choose (x-p1) ?
 
  • #20
Damascus Road said:
If all 3 points are on the plane, what makes you choose (x-p1) ?

You could choose any point on there. Give it a try for p3 and see what happens!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
603
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
4K