Equation of electric field line

Click For Summary
The electric field described by E⃗ =(4iˆ+4jˆ) N/C represents a uniform field in the x-y plane, directed at a 45-degree angle with a magnitude of 4√2 N/C. The discussion clarifies that the presence of unit vectors i and j does not imply spatial dependency; instead, they indicate the components of the electric field. It is established that the electric potential at points A(4 m, 0) and B(0, 4 m) is actually the same, contradicting the initial claim that potential at A is greater than at B. The relationship between electric field and potential is explored, emphasizing that the potential difference between two points in a uniform field is zero. The conclusion drawn is that the potential difference between points A and B is indeed zero, confirming the uniform nature of the electric field.
  • #31
Right.

Oh oh Gracy, you really have a knack for threads that stretch seemingly forever :smile:

Take this from #17:
gracy said:
dv/dr is the the derivative of voltage with respect to position. It represents the magnitude of the electric field at a point. r is the position of the point
I think it is clear to you by now that the derivative wrt a vector has components. Because from a point ##\vec r## you can go in different directions ##d\vec r##. Dividing by a vector (and ##d\vec r## is a vector) isn't defined. I know you dislike calculus, but we really can't do without. So browse (or better: study carefully) here and here . And when doing an exercise, make a full stop at a points where you can't -- at least in principle -- distinguish what a derivative or an integral in the expression entails. I grant you it's sometimes difficult to imagine (I, for one, still have that with curl, in spite of all the explanatory examples).

I seem to sense that you have less inhibition with the alternative form: If the force is ##q\vec E##, the work needed to move a charge over a differential ## d\vec r## is ##dW = - q\vec E \cdot d\vec r## . In terms of potential ##dV = - \vec E \cdot d\vec r##
This is in fact still a differential form (i first called this the integral form, but that is after you add the ##\int## left and right).​

Then:
Actually potential is asked not potential difference.
If the sentence says "...VA is more than VB ... " then that really means you are supposed to say something about the potential difference.

And:
Gradually the notion "there is a sentence" in your problem statement evolves into something like "Is the following statement correct:
In the electric field E⃗ =(4iˆ+4jˆ) N/C, electric potential at A(4 m, 0) is more than the electric potential at B(0, 4 m) "​
So why didn't you render the problem statement a bit more faithfully when starting the thread ?

Finally:
Your post #28 shows you have indeed developed mastery of the subject at hand. #27 had some (small) room for improvement: ##
W/q = \Delta V = -\vec E\cdot\Delta \vec r ## , with ##
\Delta \vec r = \vec b-\vec a## would have avoided your confusion. There is only a slight visual difference between a \cdot that stands for the inner product of two vectors and a period (which is a bit lower on the line). (*)

But:
Since your occupation still states "pedantic student", I am glad I still have room to offer for improvement in post #28: ##
dV = \int_A^B \vec E {\bf \cdot } d\vec r\ ## should be ##\Delta V = \int_A^B dV = \int_A^B -\vec E {\bf \cdot } d\vec r\ ##

And if you really want it perfect you also replace ##\vec E. \vec b - \vec a\ ## by ##\vec E\cdot \left (\vec b - \vec a\ \right ) ## (so: \cdot and brackets) !

:smile:

As we know: nobody's perfect...

(*) some pedantic but well meant advice:
  • use right mouse button | show Math as ... | TeX commands a bit more to evolve TeX skills
  • keep math equations left and right sides together inside one single ##\#\# ## ... ## \#\# ## block: the = should be a TeX equals sign ##=## , not a text equals sign.. Same for plus (+ vs ##+##) and minus (- vs ##-##).
--
 
  • Like
Likes gracy and ehild
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
BvU said:
you really have a knack for threads that stretch seemingly forever
If only PF had an award for this type of salience.
BvU said:
use right mouse button | show Math as ... | TeX commands a bit more to evolve TeX skills
Hey, I just realized this feature. Now I don't need to quote the entirety of a certain comment from which I want to just copy one or more equations.
By the way @gracy , are you sure you don't miss any negative signs in the expression for the E field vector? Where did you cite the sentence In the electric field E⃗ =(4iˆ+4jˆ) N/C, electric potential at A(4 m, 0) is more than the electric potential at B(0, 4 m) from? Because if it's a textbook, such a fundamental mistake is very rarely found.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #33
blue_leaf77 said:
Where did you cite the sentence In the electric field E⃗ =(4iˆ+4jˆ) N/C, electric potential at A(4 m, 0) is more than the electric potential at B(0, 4 m) from? Because if it's a textbook, such a fundamental mistake is very rarely found.
No,Actually it was a question itself.State whether the statement is wrong or right?
 
  • #34
BvU said:
I am glad I still have room to offer for improvement
I am always open to improve myself.
 
  • #35
BvU said:
except that you can't take V = 0 at infinity as a reference.
Why can't we take V = 0 at infinity as a reference in here
post #24
 
  • #36
"I am always open to improve myself" I claim the same, but like with these vector derivatives in many dimensions, there are so many directions that I am forced to pick only one to work on, and let the others wait...

gracy said:
Why can't we take V = 0 at infinity as a reference in here
post #24
E.g. along the line y = x the E field is a constant vector, parallel with ##d\vec s## . So ##\vec E \cdot d\vec s = |\vec E|ds## and ##\int |\vec E|ds = |\vec E|\int ds \ \ ##: 'unbounded'.

Other way to look at this: you can't get such an electric field configuration with finite equipment ( an infinitely wide and high flat-plate capacitor).

Same thing happens with infinitely long wires. Didn't we have a thread on that already ?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K