Equation of motion: Help with DiffEq (2nd order non linear)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a second-order non-linear differential equation that describes the motion of a point charge A, influenced by the electric field of a fixed point charge B. The forces acting on charge A are derived from Coulomb's law, resulting in the equation of motion expressed as r[t]² r''[t] = -(k q²)/m. A proposed method involves using an integrating factor and a substitution to simplify the equation, leading to a relationship involving trigonometric functions. The solution indicates that charge A accelerates towards charge B, resembling the motion of a mass falling towards a planet. The complexity of the solution suggests that numerical methods may be necessary for practical analysis.
Adoniram
Messages
93
Reaction score
6
I am trying to solve the differential equation that will give me the equation of motion of a point charge under the influence of another point charge's electric field.

Say point charge A is free to move, and it currently a distance D away from point charge B. Point charge B is fixed in space.

Say charge A has q = +q, and charge B has q = -q. The two charges will attract.

Ignoring all other influences (gravity, etc), charge A should experience a force F = qE, where E is the field due to charge B, or:
F = -(k q^2)/r^2
where k = 1/4πε (imagine that ε is the permittivity of free space; I'm using the available symbols)

Solving for equations of motion, I use:
ma = -(k q^2)/r^2

or
a = -(k q^2)/(m r^2)

Putting it another way, r → r[t], a → r''[t]
Then I get:
r[t]2 r''[t] = -(k q^2)/m

Or
r[t]2 r''[t] = C

How do I solve that differential equation? It is a 2nd order non-linear diff eq... The Mathematica answer I get is very complicated, but I'm hoping someone can help me out with this one.

Also, I can use the following initial conditions:
r[0]=D
r'[0]=0

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Adoniram said:
I am trying to solve the differential equation that will give me the equation of motion of a point charge under the influence of another point charge's electric field.

Say point charge A is free to move, and it currently a distance D away from point charge B. Point charge B is fixed in space.

Say charge A has q = +q, and charge B has q = -q. The two charges will attract.

Ignoring all other influences (gravity, etc), charge A should experience a force F = qE, where E is the field due to charge B, or:
F = -(k q^2)/r^2
where k = 1/4πε (imagine that ε is the permittivity of free space; I'm using the available symbols)

Solving for equations of motion, I use:
ma = -(k q^2)/r^2

or
a = -(k q^2)/(m r^2)

Putting it another way, r → r[t], a → r''[t]
Then I get:
r[t]2 r''[t] = -(k q^2)/m

Or
r[t]2 r''[t] = C

How do I solve that differential equation? It is a 2nd order non-linear diff eq... The Mathematica answer I get is very complicated, but I'm hoping someone can help me out with this one.

Also, I can use the following initial conditions:
r[0]=D
r'[0]=0

Thanks!

You can do it in three stages:

1) First, multiply by ##r'## (integrating factor) to get:

##\frac{d}{dt}(r'^2) = \frac{d}{dt}(\frac{-2C}{r})##

2) (The key trick): Let ##r = Dcos^2\theta##

This leads to:

##(cos^2\theta)\theta ' = \sqrt{\frac{-C}{2D^3}}##

3) Integrate to get:

##2\theta + sin(2\theta) = \sqrt{\frac{-8C}{D^3}}t##
 
So no simple solution. I typed x'' = -1/x^2 here and it came back with this picture:

http://www4c.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP12181g1a4ceci2e2i16500005a8e262bb5i0g8e3?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=10&w=388.&h=101.
Got the same picture doing a simple numeric integration with excel:

upload_2015-8-20_22-29-40.png


(x on the left axis, v and a on the right axis)Basically the mobile charge just "falls" towards the fixed charge in the same way a small mass falls towards a planet: initially slowly (the change in attractive force is small) and then accelerating faster and faster.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top