Equation problem. How to elimintate t?

  • Thread starter Thread starter intijk
  • Start date Start date
intijk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
\Psi(x,t)=Ae^{-a[(mx^2/h)+i t]} (1)

A and a are positive real constant.

Use Normalization to get A, the answer says that:

1=2|A|^2 \int_0^\inf e^{-2amx^2/h}dx (2)

Can you show me how to do the transform to get the righside of the equation (2)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, you can write the equation as
\Psi(x,t)= Ae^{-amx^2/h}e^{ait}

To "normalize" that function means to find A such that the integral of |\Psi|^2= (\Psi)(\Psi^*), the product of \Psi and its complex conjugate, over all "space", is 1. The only "i" is in e^{ait} and, of course, (e^{ait})(e^{-ait})= 1. Since this has only one space variable, x, that should be for x from -\infty to \infty. Of course, the function is even in x so you can just integrate from 0 to \infty and then multiply by 2.
 
Thank you, HallsofIvy.
I know it now. In \Psi^* there is a e^{-ait}.
So, \Psi\Psi^* will cause e^{ait}e^{-ait}=1, then t is eliminated.

Thank you so much!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top