Equation utility function help

  • Thread starter Thread starter surferbarney0729
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Utility
AI Thread Summary
The utility function discussed is U = ln(2C), where C represents consumption. The individual has an annual income of $40,000 and faces a 2% risk of a $30,000 loss from an accident. The expected utility calculated is 11.262, leading to a certain wealth equivalent of approximately $38,906.20. This amount indicates the maximum willingness to pay for insurance, which is $1,093.80. An alternative perspective suggests using the utility of expected consumption, resulting in a willingness to pay of $600 instead.
surferbarney0729
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I understand the idea of the questio, but am perplexed as what to put in the equation to get it to equal $38906.20

Here is the question and answer
Your utility function is U = ln(2C) where C is the amount of consumption you have in
any given period. Your income is $40,000 per year and there is a 2% chance that you
will be involved in a catastrophic accident that will cost you $30,000 next year

I have solved the first parts, and EU is 11.262, but the last section is confusing me

What is the most that you would be willing to pay for insurance, given your utility
function?

To answer this question, first go back to the original utility to determine how much
money would yield the same utility as the expected utility of taking the risk. The wealth
that would yield utility of 11.262 solves ln(2W) = .98ln(80,000) + .02ln(20,000), so W =
exp(.98ln(80,000) + .02ln(20,000))/2 ≈ $38,906.20. You are indifferent between the risky
situation and certain wealth of $38,906.20 because they yield the same utility. Therefore,
you should be willing to pay $40,000 – 38,906.20 = $1,093.80 for insurance.

Any help on what my equation needs to look like to get 38,906.20?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks to me like you solved it. Can you clarify what your question is?

By the way, you are looking at expected utility. I could argue that the more correct method is utility of expected consumption. In that case I would be willing to pay $600.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...

Similar threads

Back
Top