[Game Theory] A pedestrian is hit by a car. How many people will help?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a game theory problem involving a pedestrian who has been hit by a car and the decision-making process of bystanders regarding whether to call for help. The focus is on finding the symmetric Nash equilibrium in a mixed strategy context, where the utility and costs associated with calling for help are analyzed.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • The initial problem statement outlines the scenario and the utility structure for bystanders, where calling for help incurs a cost and provides a payoff based on others' actions.
  • One participant proposes a formula for the payoff when a bystander does not call for help, but expresses uncertainty about its correctness.
  • Another participant corrects the first, indicating that the payoff should reflect the probability that no one else calls for help, leading to a payoff of zero in that case.
  • A subsequent reply confirms the corrected payoff structure and suggests an equation for determining the Nash equilibrium.
  • A final comment introduces a humorous observation about the situation, reflecting on the irony of the pedestrian's fate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants engage in a collaborative effort to clarify the payoff calculations, with some corrections made along the way. However, the discussion does not reach a consensus on the final implications or outcomes of the Nash equilibrium analysis.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the utility values and costs, and the dependence on the number of bystanders (n) is noted, but these aspects remain unresolved in terms of their broader implications.

Who May Find This Useful

Students or individuals interested in game theory, particularly in understanding Nash equilibria in social dilemmas and decision-making scenarios.

Dostre
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the following social problem. A pedestrian is hit by a car and lies injured on the road. There are n people in the vicinity of the accident. The injured pedestrian requires immediate medical attention, which will be forthcoming if at least one of the n people call for help. Simultaneously and independently, each of the n bystanders decides whether or not to call for help (by dialing 911 on a cell phone or pay phone). Each bystander obtains v units of utility if someone (anyone) calls for help. Those who call for help pay a personal cost of c . That is, if person i calls for help, then he obtains the payoff v-c. If person i does not call but at least one other person calls, then person i gets v. Finally, if none of the n people calls for help, then person i obtains 0. Assume v>c.

1. The purpose of this question is to find the symmetric Nash equilibrium of this n-player game. This equilibrium is in mixed strategies, i.e. such that each person is indifferent between his/her two possible strategies: to call or not to call. Therefore, each player’s payoff must be equal when he/she calls and when he/she does not call.

a. We already know that player i’s payoff is v-c when he/she calls. Write the payoff of player i when he/she does not call, letting p be the probability that a person does not call for help. Hint: there are n-1 players others than player i. Therefore, with probability p^{n-1}, no one of the other players will call, and with probability 1-p^{n-1} at least one of the other players will call.​
b. By setting player i’s payoff equal when he/she calls and does not call, find the probability that a person does not call p in equilibrium (Hint: this will be a function of c/v and n).
2. Compute the probability that at least one person calls for help in equilibrium 1-p^n.
How does this depend on n? Can you comment? (Hint: to answer the second part of the question you need to differentiate it with respect to n).


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


All I need is to figure out what the payoffs are, and I will be able to solve the rest. For part 1.a the payoff I came up with is (1-p^{n-1})v+p^{n-1}(v-c), but I am leaning towards the fact that it is wrong. Help appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yep. It's wrong. There's a pn-1 probability that no one else calls. What is the payoff in this event?
 
If no one calls it is zero. Then, the payoff of the ith player is p^{n-1}*0+(1-p^{n-1})v . So for part b would it be correct to say that v-c=(1-p^{n-1})v ?
 
Correct. That's your Nash equilibrium.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Hmm... he died in a car crash, how ironic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K