Equations of Motion Revisited

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion addresses corrections made to the "Equations of Motion Revisited" article, specifically regarding the order of calculations in examples 2 and 3, as well as the units used for speed in the first example. The speed was initially presented in meters instead of meters per second, which has been rectified. These amendments enhance the clarity and accuracy of the content, ensuring that readers receive precise information on projectile motion calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly kinematics.
  • Familiarity with the equations of motion, including displacement, velocity, and acceleration.
  • Knowledge of unit conversions, specifically between meters and meters per second.
  • Experience with problem-solving techniques in two-dimensional projectile motion.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the fundamental equations of motion for one and two dimensions.
  • Explore detailed examples of two-dimensional projectile motion calculations.
  • Study unit conversion techniques to ensure accuracy in physics problems.
  • Investigate common mistakes in kinematic equations and how to avoid them.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in improving their understanding of projectile motion and its calculations.

neilparker62
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,200
Reaction score
708
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link and Greg Bernhardt
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, in the calculation of the two proposed examples, the order of the presentation of the development of the calculation of points 2 and 3 or (b and c) are reversed, also the result of the speed is offered in meters and not in meters over seconds in the first example.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt and neilparker62
Richard R Richard said:
Hello, in the calculation of the two proposed examples, the order of the presentation of the development of the calculation of points 2 and 3 or (b and c) are reversed, also the result of the speed is offered in meters and not in meters over seconds in the first example.
Thanks for the correction(s). Have amended accordingly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara and Greg Bernhardt

Similar threads

Insights Quaternions in Projectile Motion
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Undergrad How to Master Projectile Motion Without Quadratics
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Undergrad How to Solve Projectile Motion Problems in One or Two Lines
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Graduate Maximizing Horizontal Range of a Projectile
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Insights How to Solve a Multi-Atwood Machine Assembly
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Undergrad Projectile Motion with a backwards Rotation/Tumble
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Insights Brownian Motions and Quantifying Randomness in Physical Systems
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
Graduate An Alternate Approach to Solving 2-Dimensional Elastic Collisions
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Explaining Rolling Motion - Comments
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
Graduate Equations of Motion for Torsional Inverted Pendulum on a moving cart
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K