Equations of motion unsolvable with elementary method

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying equations of motion that cannot be solved using elementary methods, particularly for simulations. An example provided is the motion of a body attached to an ideal spring that can rotate freely. The conversation highlights that real-world problems often lack closed-form solutions and are better approached through simulations using small time steps. The simple pendulum is mentioned as a case where the small angle approximation is solvable, but larger angles require elliptic functions for accurate results. The user expresses a desire to explore and create their own equations for simulation purposes.
Robin04
Messages
259
Reaction score
16
Hi,

Can you help me in collecting equations of motion that are unsolvable with elementary methods (especially with high school maths)? One that I found is when I release a body attached to an ideal spring that can freely rotate around an axis. The reason why I need them is because I would like to make simulations that can calculate a close outcome of the equation of motion.

Thanks for your answer in advance!

Robin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you looking for simple equations to check your simulation or are you looking for equations to use in your simulation? Real-world problems are usually too complicated to calculate a closed form solution. They are simulated in small time steps (say, 1/50 second). The forces and moments are calculated for the positions at one time. Then the motion is calculated for the small time step and new positions are obtained. Step through the simulation one time step (aka "time frame") at a time.
 
  • Like
Likes Robin04
After thinking it over again maybe that's not equations that I'm looking for. It would be much more fun to find my own equations. This example I wrote about was an exercise at a physics competition where only the situation/problem was described, and there was no information on how to solve this problem, they didn't even tell anything about the solvability. The method you described is the one that I used in my program. I determined what forces are acting on the body that are dependent on the position, expressed the acceleration, calculated the velocites and updated the positions.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
A good example is the equation of motion for a simple pendulum. It is easily solvable if you make the small angle approximation, but for larger angles the solution requires elliptic functions. You could simulate a pendulum with a large angular displacement and show how the actual motion deviates from the sinusoidal motion predicted in the small angle limit.
 
  • Like
Likes Robin04
phyzguy said:
A good example is the equation of motion for a simple pendulum. It is easily solvable if you make the small angle approximation, but for larger angles the solution requires elliptic functions. You could simulate a pendulum with a large angular displacement and show how the actual motion deviates from the sinusoidal motion predicted in the small angle limit.

Thank you ver much. I'll try this one. :)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top